Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No. 143 /2020 — Case between KALARIPPOYIL JASIR vs KOODATHIL ABDUL RASHEED regarding partition of property.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
FDIA 1/2023 in OS 94/2022
Case between MOTTEMMAL SAKKEENA vs KINARULLA PARAMBATH MAMMOOTTY et al regarding partition of property
Mottemmala Sakkeena filed a petition for final decree regarding the partition of property as per a preliminary decree dated 24.01.2023. The defendants have no objection to passing the final decree.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
FDIA 5/2023 in OS 89/2022
Case between Subha Satheesh vs Prabha Raveendran et al regarding final decree application for partition
This case involves a partition of property as per a preliminary decree. The plaintiff, Subha Satheesh, and the defendants, including Prabha Raveendran and others, are seeking to finalize the shares of the property as determined in earlier judgments.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
FDIA. No. 15/2024 in OS. No. 106/2023
Case between Jameela Nandavanathil et al vs Shareefa Jamal et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition of property among the plaintiffs and defendants based on a preliminary decree. The plaintiffs are seeking their respective shares in the property as ordered by the court.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
FDIA 6/2025 in OS 128/2021
Case between Devi. V. P vs Anil V. P, Latha. V. P regarding partition of property.
The case involves a partition dispute among family members regarding a property. The plaintiff and defendants are seeking their respective shares based on a preliminary decree.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
F.D.A No.4/2024
Case between Saranya Rajesh and Others vs Yashoda Mani @ Manju, Saran Mani regarding Final Decree Application dismissal
This case involves a Final Decree Application dismissal as not pressed by the court
Final Decree Application
O.S No. 539/2010
Case between Padmini vs Purushothaman et al regarding Final Decree Application.
Padmini filed a Final Decree Application against Purushothaman and others. The court dismissed the application as not pressed.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
OS.No.1085/2010
Case between Mini vs Jalaja kumari et al regarding Final Decree Application.
Mini is the petitioner seeking relief through a Final Decree Application, while Jalaja kumari and others are the defendants. The case was heard but the petitioner failed to appear, leading to the dismissal of the application.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
FDA 1351/2022
Case between Sunu S. vs Sumathi et al regarding partition of property
Sunu S. filed a petition for a final decree of partition of property following a preliminary decree. The defendants, Sumathi and others, did not appear in court.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
FDA.No. 1711/2022
Case between Xavier @ Suresh vs Valsan @ Banedict regarding partition of property
Xavier @ Suresh and Valsan @ Banedict are brothers involved in a legal dispute regarding the partition of their shared property. The court has passed a final decree regarding the division of the property into two equal shares.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 160/2013
Case between Lissy vs Lilly et al regarding final decree application
Lissy, the plaintiff, filed a final decree application in an earlier civil suit for partition of property. The court has heard the petition and is finalizing the partition based on a commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 291/2015
Case between Swarnavalli et al vs Vishwaguptan et al regarding final decree application
The plaintiffs, Swarnavalli and others, filed an application for a final decree regarding the partition of property as per earlier orders. The court decided on the allotment of shares among the parties based on a commission report and survey plan.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 303/2020
Case between Soorya et al vs Sooraj regarding metes and bounds partition of property
This case involves a petition for passing a final decree regarding the partition of property among the plaintiffs and defendant. The plaintiffs are seeking to effectuate a division of the property as per a commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 491/2016
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Sunilkumar K.K. et al regarding property partition
This case involves Suresh Kumar as the plaintiff and Sunilkumar K.K., Sujitha Bhai, and Sunitha as the defendants. They are involved in a property partition dispute regarding the allocation of shares in certain lands.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 307/2023
Case between Mini et al vs Robin regarding dismissal of petition
The case involves plaintiffs Mini, Renjini, and Jayini against defendant Robin regarding a petition that was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioners. The court noted repeated opportunities were provided to the petitioner to take necessary steps.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O. S. No. 248/2000
Case between Sathi vs Shalini Manilal regarding Final Decree Application
The petitioner, Sathi, and the respondent, Shalini Manilal, have settled their disputes through mediation. The court accepted the mediation agreement and passed a final decree according to its terms.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 448/2017
Case between Vysakh. S. Kumar vs Sandhya et al regarding Final Decree Application
The case involves Vysakh. S. Kumar as the petitioner against Sandhya and others regarding a final decree application. The court dismissed the application for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
Final Decree Appln. 7/2023 in O.S. No. 131/2019
Case between Athira Ajayan et al vs Sasidharan Pillai et al regarding petition for final decree
Athira Ajayan and others are petitioners in a final decree application against Sasidharan Pillai and others. The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 341/2018
Case between Sudarsanan Pillai vs Sudharmini et al regarding Final Decree Application
Sudarsanan Pillai filed a final decree application against Sudharmini and others. The court dismissed the application for default due to failure to file the necessary commission application.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 409/2021
Case between Harikumar et al vs Sreekumar regarding metes and bounds partition
The plaintiffs, Harikumar, Sreekumari, and Bindhu, seek a final decree for partitioning property after a preliminary decree awarded them 3/4 share. The defendant, Sreekumar, remained absent and was set exparte during the proceedings.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.305/2010
Case between Philomina Rajan et al vs Joy Bai et al regarding passing of final decree
The petitioners, Philomina Rajan and Rajan, are seeking a final decree in a partition case. The respondents include Joy Bai and others, and the case involves allotting shares of property as per the commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
O.S 223/2019
Case between Sindhu vs Binu regarding Final Decree Application
Sindhu is the petitioner and Binu is the respondent. The Final Decree application was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
FDA No.21/2024 In O.S. No. 109/2009
Case between P.M. Joseph @ Appachan vs Treesa Chacko et al regarding Final Decree Application
P.M. Joseph @ Appachan filed a final decree application against Treesa Chacko and others. The court dismissed the application as no preliminary decree was passed in favor of the fourth defendant.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
FDA No.3231/2019
Case between Salikutty Iype vs Sheri Reji et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition of property among the plaintiffs and defendants. The court passed a final decree after a preliminary decree was issued.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.473/2013
Case between K S Bhaskaran vs Krishnakumari et al regarding partition of property
The plaintiffs, K S Bhaskaran and Remadevi B, sought a final decree for partition of property against defendants including Krishnakumari and others. The court addressed the execution of a Will and the rightful shares of the parties involved.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
FDA No. 14/2024 IN O.S No. 160/1980
Case between T. M George vs Chinto Jose Mathew et al regarding Final Decree application
T. M George filed a Final Decree application against Chinto Jose Mathew and others. The petitioner expressed disinterest in proceeding with the application.
Final Decree application
Defendant Won
O.S No. 206/2022
Case between Alex Jacob et al vs N. C Jacob et al regarding Final Decree application
The petitioners Alex Jacob, Rosamma Thomas, and Jibin Thomas filed a Final Decree application. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed after hearing the counsel on December 10, 2025.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
FDA No. 04/2020 in OS No. 262 /2015
Case between Gopalakrishnan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding Final Decree Application.
The case involves petitioners Gopalakrishnan Nair and others against respondents Ramachandran Nair and others regarding a Final Decree Application. The court ruled on the application submitted by the petitioners.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 125/2021
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are Alikkutty. T. P and Asya, while the defendant is Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji. The case involves a suit filed under the Civil Procedure Code, but the plaintiffs were not ready for evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 47/2024
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, led by Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji, allege that the defendants trespassed on their property and caused damage. The case seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants to prevent further interference with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 129/2025 in OS 224/2016
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs BALAN regarding execution petition
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the petitioner represented by SOORYA PRAKASH. B, while BALAN is the respondent. The matter involved an execution petition which was settled between the parties.
Execution Petition
EP 15/2025
Case between T K Abdul Salam vs Kunhammad regarding execution petition
T K Abdul Salam is the petitioner and Kunhammad is the respondent. The matter was settled between the parties as per the terms of settlement entered before the Sub Court, Vatakara.
Execution Petition
EP 115/2025 in OS 177/2015
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs CHANDRI et al regarding execution petition
This case involves KERALA GRAMIN BANK as the plaintiff and CHANDRI and others as defendants regarding an execution petition. The matter was settled between the parties, leading to the closure of the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
EP 96/2025
Case between Asya vs Sameera regarding execution proceedings.
The petitioner Asya filed an execution petition against the respondent Sameera. The court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's lack of steps as directed.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
MC/22/25
Case between State of Kerala vs Kunhikannan regarding null
The petitioner is the State of Kerala and the respondent is Kunhikannan. The case is about a matter which has already been registered earlier.
null
EP 89/2024
Case between KAVILUMPARA RURAL EMPLOYEES & WORKERS WELFARE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. et al vs SUNIL. K et al regarding EP proceedings.
The case involves Kavilumpara Rural Employees & Workers Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. represented by its Secretary, Nisha. K. V, and two respondents, Sunil. K and Pavithran. K. C. The matter pertains to an execution petition that has been settled with full satisfaction recorded.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
EP 2/2025
Case between Vinodan NIRAN V G vs Vijayan regarding EP dismissal
Vinodan NIRAN V G is the petitioner, and Vijayan is the respondent. The case involved a petition which was dismissed for want of steps.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
OS/1136/1953
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
This case involves the petitioners Thondarkulangara Korumbathi and others against the respondents Thondarkulangara Chekkon and others regarding a preliminary decree. The court issued its order on the date specified.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 123/2022
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves JANU, the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against BAHULEYAN @ BABU, the defendant, regarding trespassing and boundary destruction of the plaint schedule property. The petitioner claims identity issues regarding the property need resolution before the court can proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS/86/1943
Case between Thayath Kunhayi vs Pathu regarding null
Thayath Kunhayi is the petitioner, and Pathu is the respondent. The case concerns a matter that is not explicitly mentioned.
EP 58/2025
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD et al vs KUNHIRAMAN et al regarding default dismissal.
The petitioner is Iringan Noor Service Cooperative Bank Ltd represented by Secretary Anil Aravind, while the respondents include Kunhiraman and Dineshan. The case involves a default dismissal due to the DH not being ready for enquiry.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
EP 44/2025
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs NISAR et al regarding execution petition.
The case involves the IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. as the petitioner and NISAR, ASHRAF, and another ASHRAF as the respondents concerning an execution petition. The court dismissed the petition for default as the decree holder was not ready for inquiry.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 72/2025
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The case involves SYNDICATE BANK as the plaintiff against ADARSH. A. C and others as defendants concerning a civil suit. The matter was settled, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 148/2025
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the Decree Holder/Plaintiff seeking execution of a petition against MUTHURAJ, who is reported to be abroad. The petition was not executed as the Judgment Debtor was unavailable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 5/2024
Case between Gangadharan vs Ahammad et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff Gangadharan is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing and constructing a mobile tower in proximity to his property. The defendants include Ahammad and Summit Digital Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., who are accused of disturbing the plaintiff's property boundaries.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 16/2023
Case between Asya vs C. K. Sahad regarding fixation of boundary and recovery of possession
Asya and C. K. Sahad, siblings, are involved in a dispute regarding the encroachment of property. The plaintiff, Asya, claims that the defendant has unlawfully constructed on her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 17/2025
Case between FEDERAL BANK vs RADHA. N. P et al regarding settlement of suit.
The case involves FEDERAL BANK as the plaintiff and RADHA. N. P, NANU. N. P, RASEETHA. P. B as defendants. The matter has been settled.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 26/2013
Case between Meenakshi Amma vs Kuttiyil Pocker et al regarding dismissal of suit due to abatement.
The plaintiff, Meenakshi Amma, filed a suit against defendants including Kuttiyil Pocker and others. The court found that the plaintiff had expired and no steps were taken to implead legal heirs, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 11/2016
Case between Kurunnan Veetil Usman et al vs Kurunnan Veetil Moideen et al regarding fixation and mandatory injunction.
The petitioners, Kurunnan Veetil Usman and Kurunnan Veetil Safiya, have filed a petition to implead Jameela K.V. as a supplemental defendant in a suit regarding a property dispute. The respondents oppose the petition stating it is belated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won