Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
FDIA 6/2025 in OS 128/2021

Case between Devi. V. P vs Anil V. P, Latha. V. P regarding partition of property.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-3 years 2 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a partition dispute among family members regarding a property. The plaintiff and defendants are seeking their respective shares based on a preliminary decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal parts according to the preliminary decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of property and separate possession of shares.
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal parts according to the preliminary decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court adhered to the preliminary decree allowing the partition as per the commission report.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court adhered to the preliminary decree allowing the partition as per the commission report.
Supporting Evidence
As per the discussions in the commission report and preliminary decree and judgment dated 19.09.2022, the parties are entitled to get their share over the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

A final decree is passed as follows: The plaint schedule property is divided into 4 equal parts.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devi. V. P
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil V. P
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latha. V. P
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunil V. P
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Preliminary decree dated 19.09.2022, Commission report filed by Adv. Krishnakumar. K.
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. R. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Joy Jain
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaint schedule property is divided and possessed by the respective parties.
Evidence:
A final decree is passed as follows: The plaint schedule property is divided into 4 equal parts.
Relief Type: Equity
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the petitioners to compensate the respondents towards the equity of shares.
Evidence:
The 1st petitioner has to give an amount of Rs.10,781.50/- to the 1st respondent and Rs.12,187.50/- to the 2nd respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The Commission Report submitted by the Advocate Commissioner regarding the partition of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Surveyor plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The Surveyor Plan filed by the Advocate Commissioner which is integral to the property partition.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Valuation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Valuation Report of Plot A related to the property division.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)
Document Type: Valuation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Valuation Report of Plot B related to the property division.
Reference:
Ext.C2(b)
Document Type: Valuation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Valuation Report of Plot C related to the property division.
Reference:
Ext.C2(c)
Document Type: Valuation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Valuation Report of Plot D related to the property division.
Reference:
Ext.C2(d)
Document Type: Share List
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Share List No. 1 related to the property division.
Reference:
Ext.C2(e)
Document Type: Share List
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Share List No. 2 related to the property division.
Reference:
Ext.C2(f)
Document Type: Share List
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Share List No. 3 related to the property division.
Reference:
Ext.C2(g)
Document Type: Share List
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Share List No. 4 related to the property division.
Reference:
Ext.C2(h)
Document Type: Share Equalisation Account
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Share Equalisation Account related to the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C2(i)
Document Type: NJ Stamp Account
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
NJ Stamp Account related to the valuation for the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C2(j)

Case Classification

Case Type
Final Decree Application
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Devi. V. P vs Anil V. P, Latha. V. P regarding partition of property.
Case Code Year
Case between Devi. V. P vs Anil V. P, Latha. V. P regarding partition of property.

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 09/19/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jameela Nandavanathil et al vs Shareefa Jamal et al regarding partition of property
Court of the Munsiff, Nadapuram
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Subha Satheesh vs Prabha Raveendran et al regarding final decree application for partition
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between MOTTEMMAL SAKKEENA vs KINARULLA PARAMBATH MAMMOOTTY et al regarding partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between KALARIPPOYIL JASIR vs KOODATHIL ABDUL RASHEED regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Malini vs Maya Krishnakumar et al regarding partition of property
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won