Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 802/2011

Case between Malini vs Maya Krishnakumar et al regarding partition of property

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi K Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Malini, the second plaintiff, seeks partition of property following the death of her mother, the first plaintiff. The case revolves around the validity of a Will executed by the first plaintiff in favor of the second plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the Will executed by the first plaintiff valid and granted the second plaintiff a two-thirds share in the property, while the defendant is entitled to one-third. A supplementary preliminary decree was passed accordingly.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A supplementary preliminary decree is passed in favor of the petitioner.
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Will was found valid and executed in accordance with Indian legal standards.

Judgment Evidence:

Accordingly, based on the evidence on record, the Court is satisfied that a supplementary preliminary decree in favour of the petitioner deserves to be passed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Malini (Age not specified years) Airiyil, Eroor Desam, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk

Defendants

Maya Krishnakumar (51 years) Airyil Narayaneeyam House, Thrippunithura - Elumana Road, Eroor South P O, Eroor Desam, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk - 682 306 Rajasree (53 years) W/o Murali Madhavan Nair, Maya House, Pazhaveedu P O, Alappuzha - 688 009 Rajendra Menon (47 years) B/o Rajasree, Maya House, Pazhaveedu P O, Alappuzha - 688 009 Jayashree Satheesh (52 years) W/o Satheesh, Flat No. H 61/24, Sector 4, Sunrise Co - operative Housing Society, Nerul, Navi Mumbai - 400 706

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner was granted a two-thirds share in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Accordingly, the petitioner is entitled to a two-thirds (2/3) share in the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Will executed by the first plaintiff bequeathing her share in the property to the second plaintiff is key to the plaintiff's claim of entitlement to a two-thirds share in the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The death certificate of the first plaintiff is relevant to establish her death and support the validity of the Will dated 02.04.2009.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases