Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 539/2010

Case between Padmini vs Purushothaman et al regarding Final Decree Application.

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-02-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Padmini filed a Final Decree Application against Purushothaman and others. The court dismissed the application as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the Final Decree Application filed by Padmini as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the Final Decree Application filed by Padmini as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Not press memo filed by counsel for petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
Not press memo filed by counsel for petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
Not press memo filed by counsel for petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Final Decree Application is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Padmini
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o Damodaran K T
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Purushothaman
Party Age
78
Relation
S/o Kunjukuttan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manorama
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o Udayan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o Udayan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajitha
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o Udayan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Murali
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o Udayan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dileep S Kallar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K R Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sangeetha K S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreerekha K S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswin Venugopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kurian Maxi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Final Decree Application is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence Final Decree Application is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Final Decree Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Padmini vs Purushothaman et al regarding Final Decree Application.
Case Code Year
Case between Padmini vs Purushothaman et al regarding Final Decree Application.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunu S. vs Sumathi et al regarding partition of property
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Mini vs Jalaja kumari et al regarding Final Decree Application.
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Final Decree Application Defendant Won
Case between Babu et al vs Abraham et al regarding partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Malini vs Maya Krishnakumar et al regarding partition of property
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Saranya Rajesh and Others vs Yashoda Mani @ Manju, Saran Mani regarding Final Decree Application dismissal
MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Final Decree Application Unknown