Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 539/2010

Case between Padmini vs Purushothaman et al regarding Final Decree Application.

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-02-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Padmini filed a Final Decree Application against Purushothaman and others. The court dismissed the application as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the Final Decree Application filed by Padmini as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Not press memo filed by counsel for petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Final Decree Application is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Padmini (57 years) Alunkal (Valiyatharaparambu) House, Vaduthala, Kochi- 682023

Defendants

Purushothaman (78 years) Valiyathalaparambil House, Cheranellur Village, Vaduthala Desom, Kanayannur Taluk. Manorama (65 years) Valiyaparambil House, Vaduthala, Kochi- 682023 Babu (46 years) Valiyaparambil House, Vaduthala, Kochi- 682023 Ajitha (44 years) Valiyaparambil House, Vaduthala, Kochi- 682023 Murali (42 years) Valiyaparambil House, Vaduthala, Kochi- 682023

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Final Decree Application is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence Final Decree Application is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases