Case Summary
This case involves a partition of property as per a preliminary decree. The plaintiff, Subha Satheesh, and the defendants, including Prabha Raveendran and others, are seeking to finalize the shares of the property as determined in earlier judgments.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition and separate possession of respective shares in the plaint A and B schedule properties.
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered a final decree partitioning the properties into 6 equal shares, with specific shares allotted to each party.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court confirmed the shares based on the preliminary decree and the commission report.
The court confirmed the shares based on the preliminary decree and the commission report.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court confirmed the shares based on the preliminary decree and the commission report.
The court confirmed the shares based on the preliminary decree and the commission report.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint A and B schedule properties are divided into 6 equal parts... Plot A, A1 in item No.1 and plot A in item No.2 shown in the plan has been allotted to the share of the petitioner/plaintiff...
Judgment Evidence:
In tune with the preliminary decree for partition in the property the plaintiff/petitioner have taken out a commission... the parties are entitled to get their share over the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subha Satheesh
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prabha Raveendran
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reshmi Raveendranathan
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prasanna Bhaskaran
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Arunkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Padmanabhan Ponnamkott
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to partition and separate possession of the respective share.
Evidence:
Plot A, A1 in item No.1 and plot A in item No.2 shown in the plan has been allotted to the share of the petitioner/plaintiff and is entitled to get partition and separate possession of respective share.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The 1st and 2nd respondents are entitled to get partition and separate possession of their respective shares.
Evidence:
Plot C shown in item No.1 and plot C shown in item No.2 plan in the plan has been allotted to the share of the 1st and 2nd respondent/defendants and are entitled to get partition and separate possession of their respective shares.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The 3rd respondent is entitled to get partition and separate possession over his respective share.
Evidence:
Plot B shown in item No.1 and plot B shown in item No.2 in the plan has been allotted to the share of the 3rd respondent/defendant and is entitled to get partition and separate possession over his respective share.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plot D is reserved as a way for all the defendants.
Evidence:
Plot D shown in item No.1 plan is not made partible and it is reserved as a way to enter into their plots for all the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court used this document to determine the measurements and allocation of shares in the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Surveyor plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court referred to this plan to visualize the division of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The report was used to inspect the property for accurate allocation of shares.
Reference:
Ext.C3
Document Type:
Surveyor plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This plan supported the allocation of shares as per the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C4
Document Type:
Share List
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The share list provides details of the allocated shares among the parties.
Reference:
C5 series
Case Classification
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Subha Satheesh vs Prabha Raveendran et al regarding final decree application for partition
Case Code Year
Case between Subha Satheesh vs Prabha Raveendran et al regarding final decree application for partition