Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
FDIA. No. 15/2024 in OS. No. 106/2023

Case between Jameela Nandavanathil et al vs Shareefa Jamal et al regarding partition of property

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Nadapuram
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-06-27
Duration
approximately-1 year 12 days
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a partition of property among the plaintiffs and defendants based on a preliminary decree. The plaintiffs are seeking their respective shares in the property as ordered by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court passed a final decree for partitioning the property among the parties as per the commission report. Plaintiffs are entitled to a specific share.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition and separate possession of property as per shares
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
The court passed a final decree for partitioning the property among the parties as per the commission report. Plaintiffs are entitled to a specific share.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court validated the preliminary decree and confirmed the entitlement of shares based on the commission report.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court validated the preliminary decree and confirmed the entitlement of shares based on the commission report.
Supporting Evidence
As per the discussions in the commission report and preliminary decree and judgment dated 15.06.2024, a final decree is passed as follows:-

Judgment Evidence:

In tune with the preliminary decree for partition in the property the petitioners/plaintiffs have taken out a commission and the Advocate Commissioner had measured out the property...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jameela Nandavanathil
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajeera
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammad Savaj
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sinan
Party Age
16
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shareefa Jamal
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shameema
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shamseera
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fasna
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fasil
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
N/A
Defendants Documents
N/A

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. M. Rajagopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Faisal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are entitled to partition and separate possession over their respective shares in metes and bounds.
Evidence:
the plaintiffs are entitled to get 46/88 share over the allotted part and are entitled for partition and separate possession over their respective shares in metes and bounds.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are entitled to partition and separate possession over their respective shares.
Evidence:
the defendants are entitled to get partition and separate possession over their respective shares however they have to pay the requisite court fee.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Parties are directed to produce stamp paper for their share value for engrossing the final decree.
Evidence:
Parties are directed to produce stamp paper for their share value for engrossing the final decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Parties are directed to pay additional batta to the Advocate Commissioner.
Evidence:
Parties are directed to pay additional batta of Rs.10,000/- to the Advocate Commissioner for the volume of work done.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Parties are directed to suffer their costs.
Evidence:
Parties are directed to suffer their costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by the Advocate Commissioner detailing the measurement for partition.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Surveyor plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Plan filed by the Taluk Surveyor indicating the division of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Valuation Schedule
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details on the valuation of the property related to the partition.
Reference:
C3 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Final Decree Application
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jameela Nandavanathil et al vs Shareefa Jamal et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Jameela Nandavanathil et al vs Shareefa Jamal et al regarding partition of property

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 06/15/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Devi. V. P vs Anil V. P, Latha. V. P regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Subha Satheesh vs Prabha Raveendran et al regarding final decree application for partition
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between MOTTEMMAL SAKKEENA vs KINARULLA PARAMBATH MAMMOOTTY et al regarding partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between KALARIPPOYIL JASIR vs KOODATHIL ABDUL RASHEED regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Malini vs Maya Krishnakumar et al regarding partition of property
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won