Similar Cases
Based on: OS No. 23 / 2016 — Case between Alias vs Kerala Kshethra Samrakshana Samithi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, recovery of money and mandatory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S. No. 473/2016
Case between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram represented by Rakesh Venugopal vs Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat regarding perpetual injunction
The case involves a dispute over property rights between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram and Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat. The plaintiff is seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent the defendant from forming a new way through the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 992/2012
Case between Manmadhan M.R et al vs Balabhadra Temple Managing Committee et al regarding temple management and administration.
The plaintiffs, members of the Mannazhath family, are suing to declare their right to manage the Balabhadra Temple, claiming that a committee formed by certain individuals is unlawfully interfering with temple administration. The defendants, a managing committee, argue that the temple is owned by the blacksmith community and that the plaintiffs have no rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 847/2018
Case between M.C. Antony vs The Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
M.C. Antony, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam, the defendant, to prevent forcible eviction from his business property. The case revolves around the claim of ownership and possession of the property by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1035 /20 216
Case between Valsala Krishnankutty et al vs Mattammel Sree Subramania Swamy Temple et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Valsala Krishnankutty and her children, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who are associated with a temple. The plaintiffs contend that they are the rightful owners of a pathway necessary for accessing their property and allege the defendants are attempting to block this access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 294/2006
Case between Sumitha Rahim et al vs Ramachandran et al regarding mandatory injunction and consequential reliefs
The plaintiffs are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, who are the office bearers of neighboring properties. The plaintiffs claim ownership of the properties and allege that the defendants are attempting to interfere with their possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 771/2021
Case between Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha et al vs Tripunithura Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default of the suit.
This case involves a suit filed by Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha and Ramesan G against Tripunithura Municipality. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, which resulted in the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1437/2019
Case between Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom et al vs Jaya Gireesh regarding suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs are Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom and its Bharana Samithi, while the defendant is Jaya Gireesh. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' repeated absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1263/2017
Case between Aiswarya Renjith vs The Padinjare Kuzhuvelil Temple et al regarding non-prosecution
The plaintiff, Aiswarya Renjith, was absent along with her counsel during the hearing. The court dismissed the suit due to non-prosecution since no proof affidavits or applications were filed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1298/2022
Case between P.G. Victor vs Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple regarding mediation report
The case involves P.G. Victor as the plaintiff and Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple as the defendant. The court delivered a judgment approving a mediation report between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1214/2014
Case between Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple et al vs Rajan et al regarding settlement scheme and injunction
The plaintiffs, including the Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple, are seeking a settlement scheme and permanent injunction against the defendants who are mismanaging the temple. The case involves disputes over the administration and enjoyment of property associated with the family temple.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No : 222/2016
Case between Raghuveer vs Sree Vettakkorumakan Kshethram et al regarding mandatory injunction and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff Raghuveer has sued for a mandatory and prohibitory injunction concerning the use of a property pathway, which he claims is essential for accessing his owned properties. The defendants include a temple and its management board, which assert that the plaintiff has no legal right over the disputed pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 242/2020
Case between Edoli Pankajam vs Pulparambil Aneesh, Ralanth Kumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction, recovery of possession and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Edoli Pankajam, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants, Pulparambil Aneesh and Ralanth Kumar, regarding a property related to the Poloor Subramania Temple. The defendants, a committee associated with the temple, argue that the suit lacks necessary parties and is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 13/2021
Case between C.V.Peter vs Alias George et al regarding declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction
Plaintiff C.V.Peter seeks declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Alias George, Palliyan, and Krishnankutty. The case revolves around a pathway used by the plaintiff to access his property through the defendants' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 36/2021
Case between Jiji vs Valsa et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves Jiji as the plaintiff filing for partition and permanent prohibitory injunction against Valsa and others.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 33 / 2024
Case between Susy Paulose et al vs Eldho Mathai et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, legal heirs of late Sri. Paulose, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing and causing damage to their property. Defendants failed to appear in court. Plaintiffs provided unchallenged evidence proving ownership and trespass.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1585/2019
Case between His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami et al vs Venkatesh Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami, the Sole Trustee of a charitable trust, sought a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Venkatesh Shenoy and Mohan Shenoy, claiming exclusive use of a pathway. The defendants contested the plaintiff's rights, asserting their own claims to the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. .1531/2019
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Jobin Thomas, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thrikkakara Municipality and Abdul Razak P.K. The case revolves around unauthorized demolition of property boundaries and potential construction disputes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1329/2018
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
G Radhakrishnan, the plaintiff, filed a suit against M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. and its managing director B R Ajit, along with Devi Ajit, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims ownership over a property and seeks protection against the defendants, who allegedly threatened to demolish his boundaries and trespass.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1042/2019
Case between St Mary Magdalene Church, Moothedam et al vs M J George et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, St. Mary Magdalene Church, Moothedam, seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants for trespassing on their land. The defendants argue that the plaintiff has no rights over the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 426/2025
Case between Viswanathan R et al vs Kousalya et al regarding boundary excavation and property support.
The petitioners, a husband and wife, are seeking an injunction against the respondents over a dispute regarding boundary excavation between their properties. They claim their property is at risk due to the respondents' actions which have allegedly removed soil without providing lateral support.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1210/2017
Case between Purushan O K vs Soman et al regarding injunction
Purushan O K filed a suit against Soman and others seeking both mandatory and prohibitory injunctions related to a property dispute involving the demolition of a compound wall and encroachment issues. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and seeks to prevent further damage by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 690/2018
Case between New Town Heights, Kakkanad Condominium, Owners Welfare Society vs M/s DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves the New Town Heights Owners Welfare Society seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. and others regarding the exclusive use of an internal road within the apartment complex. The plaintiff claims that the defendants are attempting to convert the internal road into a public pathway, violating assurances made to the apartment owners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 920/2020
Case between V.Thulaseedharan Pillai et al vs Prof. Sourier Sebastian et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, owners and residents of house plots in the Divine Nagar housing colony, seek a declaration that only they have the right to use internal roads constructed in the colony. They contend that the defendants, who reside in the adjoining area, are attempting to gain access to these roads. The case involves issues around property rights and access to shared spaces.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 783/2020
Case between Joshy vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of title and injunction.
The plaintiff, Joshy, is seeking a declaration of title and an injunction against the defendants, including the State of Kerala and its officials, for alleged illegal eviction from his property. The case revolves around claims of continuous possession and the applicability of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 661/2024
Case between Janeefer Mariam vs Kerala Film Producers Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Janeefer Mariam, alleges that the defendant, Kerala Film Producers Association, attempted to trespass on her property and obstruct her access to a pathway necessary for her property. The case revolves around a dispute regarding access rights to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 86/2018
Case between Thankappan vs Lakshmanan et al regarding partition
This case involves a partition suit filed by Thankappan against his brothers and a few other defendants regarding the share of property and bank deposits left by their deceased father, Krishnan. The defendants were accused of attempting to withdraw the bank deposits without the plaintiff's consent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 50/2015
Case between George vs Aliyamma, Biju Paulose et al regarding fixation of boundary and perpetual injunction
George is the plaintiff seeking to fix the boundary of his property against the defendants Aliyamma, Biju Paulose, and others. The defendants are claiming that their property overlaps with the plaint schedule property and are obstructing the plaintiff's request to demarcate the boundaries.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 152/2024
Case between Kannaki Viswanath vs Arun Viswanathan regarding partition.
Kannaki Viswanath and Arun Viswanathan are involved in a partition suit concerning the property inherited from their late mother, Jayanthi. The plaintiff sought a partition as the defendant was not amenable to it despite the co-ownership.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 242/2014
Case between Nandakumar A.P. vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory and perpetual injunction
Nandakumar A.P. filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others seeking mandatory and perpetual injunction to remove encroachments on a public way that he claims is essential for accessing his property. The defendants include government officials and a private individual who allegedly encroached on the way.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 17/2019
Case between Soman vs M.C. Vinayan et al regarding injunction and compensation
Soman filed a suit against M.C. Vinayan and others seeking injunction and compensation for alleged trespass and damage to his property. The court evaluated the claims regarding access to the property and determined the rights over the paths leading to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 484/2020
Case between Sree Narayana Prathima Sthapana committee et al vs SNDP Sakha Yogam No. 1682 et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sree Narayana Prathima Sthapana Committee and Satheesan V.P, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, SNDP Sakha Yogam No. 1682 and others, who allegedly attempted to trespass on the property where a statue of Sree Narayana Guru is installed. The case revolves around disputes over ownership and possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.328/2025
Case between K N Abdul Gafoor et al vs K N Fajar et al regarding Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiffs, K N Abdul Gafoor and K N Shamsudheen, are seeking a prohibitory injunction against the defendants, K N Fajar and others, regarding illegal constructions on a jointly owned property. Tensions arose over property rights after the death of family members, leading to this legal dispute.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 569/2019
Case between Sarith. S. vs Yasoram Pancharatna Apartment Owners Association regarding declaration and Injunction
Sarith. S., the plaintiff, seeks a declaration and injunction regarding necessary repairs to his apartment and common areas. The Yasoram Pancharatna Apartment Owners Association, the defendant, opposes these repairs, claiming they violate ownership agreements.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 853 /2012
Case between M R Sonaratnan et al vs Gopi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, M R Sonaratnan and Ayisha, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Gopi and Sarasamma, to prevent them from trespassing on property that the plaintiffs claim ownership of due to a disputed mortgage deed. The defendants counter that the plaintiffs lack standing and the mortgage is invalid.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 308/2025
Case between Ahmed Riza Manjalingal et al vs Adeeb Jaleel et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Ahmed Riza Manjalingal and Shahana Moinudheen are seeking a temporary injunction against Adeeb Jaleel and Omar Jaleel concerning their sports venture. They claim wrongful eviction attempts and illegal entry by the defendants after investments in property and construction of sports facilities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 167/2025
Case between Abdul Samad vs P.M.Mirsad et al regarding interim injunction.
Abdul Samad, the plaintiff, is seeking an interim injunction against P.M.Mirsad and others regarding a property dispute. The case revolves around allegations of illegal construction over a pathway claimed by the plaintiff as a public access route.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 315/2025
Case between Niyas Abdul Rahiman vs Jiji John regarding interim injunction
The plaintiff, Niyas Abdul Rahiman, seeks an interim injunction against the defendant, Jiji John, to prevent him from unlawfully fishing and trespassing on property that the plaintiff claims ownership of. The defendant argues that he has traditional fishing rights over the area in question.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 449/2025
Case between Subish K.S vs Sujith K.S regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Subish K.S filed a petition against his brother Sujith K.S for a temporary prohibitory injunction regarding a residential property that belonged to their late father. The case involves issues of possession and ownership rights of the property following the father's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 402/2025
Case between Empire Building Owners' Association vs Babu Mather regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Empire Building Owners' Association is seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction against Babu Mather for obstructing access to common areas of the Empire Building. The respondent is accused of locking public access points and causing obstructions to shared facilities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1243/2024
Case between Neeba Rajagopal vs Corporation of Cochin et al regarding declaration and injunction
Neeba Rajagopal is the plaintiff who owns a property and seeks to prevent the Corporation of Cochin from demolishing a wall she constructed, which she claims is legally compliant. The defendants are alleged to be taking action against her property without following statutory procedures.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 199/2024
Case between Vinu Koshi Abraham vs ABM Tower Residents Association et al regarding encroachments and property rights
Vinu Koshi Abraham, the petitioner, alleges that the ABM Tower Residents Association and ABM Builders (P) Ltd. have encroached upon his property rights at ABM Towers, Kochi. The case revolves around a dispute over the use of common areas and ownership of property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 653/2025
Case between Veeyem Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs Tranquil Towers Apartment and Commercial space owners Association et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction.
The case involves Veeyem Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. seeking a temporary injunction against Tranquil Towers Apartment and Commercial space owners Association and its president Sreeju Sreedharan. The plaintiff claims interference with their construction activities related to a commercial-cum-residential project due to the defendants' actions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 223/2016
Case between Nirmala Ramankutty et al vs Zahida Crockery et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, including Nirmala Ramankutty, are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Zahida Crockery and others, regarding their access to a common area in a commercial building. The dispute revolves around the defendants allegedly trespassing on the plaintiffs' common property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 377/2016
Case between M R Harikumar vs State of Kerala et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
M R Harikumar, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants to prevent the demolition of his building, which he claims was owned by his late father. The defendants argue that they have the right to demolish the building to widen the road, asserting that the plaintiff has no title over the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 547/2021
Case between Xavier Joseph alias K X Joseph vs Goshree Islands Development Authority regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Xavier Joseph, the plaintiff, is a senior citizen and the absolute owner of property in Mulavukad Village, facing actions from the Goshree Islands Development Authority to demolish his compound wall for road widening. The plaintiff contends that the land in question is legally owned by him, while the defendant claims it is government puramboke land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 651 /20 25
Case between Reena Philip vs Sachin V Visavadia, Tony Thomas regarding interim mandatory injunction
Reena Philip has filed a petition against Sachin V Visavadia and Tony Thomas, who are the President and Secretary of the Purva Eternity Apartment Owners Association. The case involves a dispute over the imposition of late payment penalties and access to common amenities in the residential project 'Purva Eternity.'
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 196/2018
Case between Vinod Menon et al vs Purva Oceana Apartment Owners Association et al regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, seek relief against the defendants who have obstructed their attempts to complete internal modifications in their apartment. The case involves issues of property rights and compliance with the homeowners' association regulations.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won