Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 547/2021

Case between Xavier Joseph alias K X Joseph vs Goshree Islands Development Authority regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-29
Duration
approximately-4 years 1 month 12 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Xavier Joseph, the plaintiff, is a senior citizen and the absolute owner of property in Mulavukad Village, facing actions from the Goshree Islands Development Authority to demolish his compound wall for road widening. The plaintiff contends that the land in question is legally owned by him, while the defendant claims it is government puramboke land.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from demolishing the compound wall and from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from demolishing the compound wall and trespassing into the property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his ownership and legal possession of the property against the defendant's claims.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs on the following terms. Defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from demolishing the compound wall of the plaint schedule property and from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from doing anything detrimental to the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Xavier Joseph alias K X Joseph (86 years years) Kurisungal House, Chambadiparambu, Ponjikkara Desom, Mulavukad P O, Mulavukad Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District.

Defendants

Goshree Islands Development Authority (Age not specified years) Goshree Chathiath Road, Pachalam P O, Kochi – 682 012.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to restrain the defendant from demolishing the compound wall and trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from demolishing the compound wall of the plaint schedule property and from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from doing anything detrimental to the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Court does not find any reason for not awarding costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relates to a prior case where the plaintiff sought injunction against encroachment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the court's ruling in favor of the plaintiff in an earlier appeal.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified copy of decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to the decree granted in the aforementioned appeal.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows transfer of property rights to plaintiff's daughter.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates transfer of property rights to plaintiff's son.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendant's request for production of property documents for road widening.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further request from KITCO for property documents.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendant's demand to demolish plaintiff's compound wall.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: G.O. (Ordinary)
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Government order sanctioning land acquisition for road development.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: G.O. (Ordinary)
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Government order authorizing expenditure for land acquisition.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Basic Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Revenue document related to the plaintiff's property.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Field Measurement Sketch
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Sketch to establish land boundaries as per government records.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court document detailing findings from the property inspection.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch related to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual evidence supporting the court's findings.
Reference:
Ext.C1(b)
Document Type: Compact Disc
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Contains additional evidence related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1(c)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 07/15/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases