Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 653/2025

Case between Veeyem Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs Tranquil Towers Apartment and Commercial space owners Association et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction.

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Veeyem Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. seeking a temporary injunction against Tranquil Towers Apartment and Commercial space owners Association and its president Sreeju Sreedharan. The plaintiff claims interference with their construction activities related to a commercial-cum-residential project due to the defendants' actions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the plaintiff's request for a temporary prohibitory injunction, restraining the defendants from diverting rainwater and obstructing construction activities related to the plaint schedule property. The court dismissed the defendants' application to vacate the injunction.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary prohibitory injunction against diverting rainwater and obstructing construction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case and balance of convenience tilted in their favor.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 1/2025 is allowed. Respondents and their men are restrained by temporary prohibitory injunction from diverting rain water from drainage on the eastern side of defendant's property to the plaint schedule property by blocking the drain of rain water through the drainage constructed on the eastern side of plaint schedule property causing obstruction to the construction activities in the plaint schedule property and also the construction of ramp between the plaint schedule property and Seaport Airport road, as per the permit, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Veeyem Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) House No. 12/115 A Valiyaveettil, Moolepaadam road, Vaazhakkala, Kakkanad P O, Pin- 682 030

Defendants

Tranquil Towers Apartment and Commercial space owners Association (Age not specified years) Kakkanad, Kochi, 686 030 Sreeju Sreedharan (44 years) 9D, Tranquil Towers, Kakkanad, Kochi, Pin- 686 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction restraining the defendants from diverting rainwater into the plaintiff's property.
Evidence:
IA 1/2025 is allowed. Respondents and their men are restrained by temporary prohibitory injunction from diverting rain water from drainage on the eastern side of defendant's property to the plaint schedule property by blocking the drain of rain water through the drainage constructed on the eastern side of plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Vacating Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition to vacate the ad-interim order passed in IA 1/2025.
Evidence:
IA 6/2025 is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Resolution authorizing the Managing Director to file the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sale deed indicating ownership of the property in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Joint Development Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement between landowners and plaintiff for constructing a project.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Approved Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plan approved by authority for the construction project.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Building Permit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Permit issued for construction by the local municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Application submitted to local authority regarding drainage.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Order permitting the drainage construction.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Injunction petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Petition filed in the District Court regarding injunction.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Police Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint regarding trespass and obstruction.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Sanction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sanction from PWD for ramp construction.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Extension of the order for construction work.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Injunction Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Order granted against the plaintiff regarding construction activities.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report on the status of the constructed drainage.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Series Photographs
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Photographic evidence related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases