Similar Cases
Based on: Original Suit No. 282 of 2014 — Case between Nechikkattil Yahu vs Ponmundam Grama Panchayath regarding building tax collection
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 268 OF 2016
Case between Ismail et al vs G. Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves plaintiffs Ismail, Najmudheen, Kunhalavi Haji, and Anwar Sadath suing defendants G. Surendran, Abdul Salm, Abdul Gafoor, and Sekkeena for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings, leading to the case being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 227 OF 2018
Case between Ummayya Umma vs The Secretary, Cheriyamundam Grama Panchayath et al regarding Injunction
Ummayya Umma filed a suit against The Secretary, Cheriyamundam Grama Panchayath and Muhammed Shaji regarding an injunction. The court delivered its judgment dismissing the suit.
Injunction
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn. 1770/2018
Case between Kalpakancheri Gramapanchayath vs Ali Muhammad regarding restoration petition
Kalpakancheri Gramapanchayath represented by its Secretary filed a restoration petition against Ali Muhammad. The court allowed the interim application in favor of the petitioner.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
EP 138/2014
Case between P. Mujeeb vs Thirunavaya Grama Panchayath regarding execution of decree
P. Mujeeb sought to execute a decree against Thirunavaya Grama Panchayath, but the decree was set aside, leading to the closure of the petition.
Civil Execution Petition
Dismissed
Restor.Ptn 1077/2015
Case between Muhamemd Ajmal Hidayathulla vs Beerankoya et al regarding restoration petition
Petitioner Muhamemd Ajmal Hidayathulla filed a restoration petition which was allowed by the court, restoring the suit as per order in IA 1077/15.
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 205 OF 2016
Case between Sajana vs Prajitha et al regarding injunction suit
Sajana filed a suit against defendants seeking an injunction. The court allowed the petition and decreed the suit as per the terms presented.
Civil Suit - Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 352/2025
Case between Gopinathan K.R vs Ezhava Samajam Trust South Chittoor et al regarding temporary injunction
Gopinathan K.R filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction against the Ezhava Samajam Trust South Chittoor and others to prevent them from constructing a gate on a private road known as Thattaril Lane. The defendants argue that the road is public and that the plaintiff lacks legal standing.
Injunction
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 95/2021
Case between Padmini et al vs Suresh et al regarding injunction and other reliefs
The case involves Padmini and Thankappan as plaintiffs seeking an injunction related to the use of a roadway. The defendants, including Suresh and Jayan, dispute the claim and contend that the plaintiffs have no right over the way in question.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 314/2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Mohammed Faisal and his wife Shejinamol seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction obstructing their access to a public road. Plaintiffs claim ownership and access rights to their property, while the Panchayath argues it holds valid authority to construct an Anganvadi on the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 300 /2019
Case between Mr. John Peter vs Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mr. John Peter filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat and others. The matter was settled in mediation, and the terms were accepted by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 314 /2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding interim injunction
The case involves petitioners Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol seeking an interim injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction on the northern side of their property. The court found the petition barred by res judicata as a similar matter had previously been decided.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 314 /2 021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding approved building plan
The petitioners, Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol, are seeking relief concerning the construction of a building. The respondent is the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 08 / 2024
Case between Shaji Varghese et al vs Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat et al regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Shaji Varghese and Baby, seek a temporary injunction against the defendants, which include Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat and Ajimon.K.M, to prevent them from trespassing on their property and demolishing a compound wall. The dispute centers on the ownership and boundaries of several plots of land.
Civil Suit
OS. No.1783/2022
Case between M.G. Siva prasad vs Secretary, Chenkal Grama Panchayath et al regarding Balance Court Fee
M.G. Siva prasad filed a suit against the Secretary of Chenkal Grama Panchayath and others regarding the remittance of balance court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.432/2020
Case between Athira vs Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat et al regarding dismissal of suit
Athira, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat and its officials. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 344/2011
Case between Saji Hussain et al vs Edava Special Grade Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Saji Hussain and Hussain are the plaintiffs, while Edava Special Grade Panchayath and additional defendants include state authorities. The case involves a suit that was dismissed based on a not pressed memo filed by the plaintiffs.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 113/ 2018
Case between Shibily vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding acceptance of witness schedule.
Shibily is the plaintiff seeking to declare a notice as null and void while also requesting to accept a witness schedule for examining the Panchayath Secretary. The defendants argue that the petition is barred by limitation and that the documents are not available.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 107/2018
Case between Chandrahasan et al vs The Secretary, Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves multiple plaintiffs led by Chandrahasan against the Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath and its committee members. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.20/2023
Case between Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd vs The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath regarding realization of an amount due
Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd is the plaintiff seeking to recover an amount due from The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The case involved a claim presented under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP No. 77/2020 in OS 94/2015
Case between Cherayakatt Beeran vs Olavanna Grama Panchayath regarding execution petition
Cherayakatt Beeran is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Olavanna Grama Panchayath. The execution petition has been stayed by the District Court.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 509/2018
Case between Indira vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissal for default
Indira, the plaintiff, was involved in a suit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 510/2018
Case between Kelan vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal for default.
Kelan, the plaintiff, is involved in a suit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 511/2018
Case between Indira vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal for default
Indira filed a lawsuit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 71/2025
Case between PURAMERI PANCHAYATH VANITHA CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO 2955 REP BY ITS SECRETARY BINDHU C vs RAJEESH T M regarding EP execution.
The case involves the Purameri Panchayath Vanitha Cooperative Society Ltd represented by its Secretary Bindhu C against Rajeesh T M. The execution petition was reviewed, but JD was reported to be not found, leading to closure of the EP for the time being.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP/70/2025
Case between purameri panchayath vanitha co operative bankrep vs manojan regarding decree debt repayment
The petitioner, purameri panchayath vanitha co operative bankrep, represented by its secretary Bindhu C, is seeking repayment of a decree debt from the respondent Manojan. The respondent has agreed to repay the debt in installments.
Plaintiff Won
EP/85/2025
Case between Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society Ltd vs Ratheesh P K et al regarding execution of decree
The petitioner is Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society Ltd, and the respondent includes Ratheesh P K and others. The case involves the execution of a decree for payment of a debt, with the respondent expressing willingness to repay.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP/86/2025
Case between Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society vs Ratheesh P K regarding enforcement of decree
Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society is the petitioner seeking to enforce a decree against Ratheesh P K, the respondent, who has filed an affidavit to clear the debt over 25 months. The court has temporarily closed the case with the option to revive it if the respondent defaults.
Civil Case
Plaintiff Won
EP No. 84/2025
Case between PURAMERI PANCHAYATH VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. D. 2955 et al vs NIDHIN. M. M, DAMODHARAN. P regarding enforcement of award.
Purameri Panchayath Vanitha Cooperative Society Ltd. filed a petition against Nidhin. M. M and Damodharan. P for enforcement of an award. The matter was settled in Adalath with terms agreed upon by the parties.
Civil Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S 22/2018
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
Anilkumar filed a petition to withdraw his suit against Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath with permission to file a fresh suit. The case involves a dispute over a pathway and compliance with legal procedures under the Panchayath Raj Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 108/2019
Case between Venugopalan Nair vs Padmini Gopinadhan et al regarding mediation settlement
Venugopalan Nair filed a suit against Padmini Gopinadhan and others. The matter was settled in mediation, with lawful terms agreed upon by both parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 81/2024
Case between Reena Thomas et al vs Shibu Thandamparambil et al regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves plaintiffs Reena Thomas, Ponnappan, and Vinl S. Anil against defendants Shibu Thandamparambil, Vinayachandran @ Vijayan, and Koruthodu Grama Panchayath. The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 216/2024
Case between Shanavas P.H. vs Mundakayam Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of a suit.
Shanavas P.H. filed a suit against Mundakayam Grama Panchayath and its secretary. The plaintiff's counsel indicated that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No.69/2023
Case between Sunitha vs Udayanapuram Panchayathu regarding suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiff, Sunitha, initiated the suit against Udayanapuram Panchayathu. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP. No. 71/2022
Case between Lissykutty vs The Secretary, Panayam Grama Panchayath regarding execution of decree.
This case involves Lissykutty as the decree holder and The Secretary of Panayam Grama Panchayath along with a Panchayath Member as judgment debtors. The petition was filed under specific rules of the Code of Civil Procedure for execution of a decree, which was ultimately satisfied.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1214/2013
Case between Mytheen Kunju vs Balachandran et al regarding execution of a decree.
Mytheen Kunju is the decree holder who filed the execution petition against Balachandran and others. The court satisfied the execution of the order on the hearing date.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
RP. 9/2024
Case between Pathu Kunju vs The Nedumpana Grama Panchayath regarding Petition
The petitioner, Pathu Kunju, filed a petition against The Nedumpana Grama Panchayath. The court allowed the petition.
Petition
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.656/2022
Case between Nubaisa vs Secretary regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Nubaisa filing a suit against the Secretary of Mayyanad Grama Panchayath regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the court proceedings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.529/2020
Case between Mohandas vs Elampalloor Grama Panchayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mohandas, filed a suit against Elampalloor Grama Panchayath and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 804/2019
Case between P K Haridas et al vs The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit for mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, including P K Haridas and Ashalatha, filed a petition to withdraw their suit against the Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath. The suit was regarding a mandatory injunction to demolish a wall, which no longer exists.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.804/2019
Case between P K Haridas et al vs The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal of the suit
The plaintiffs, P K Haridas and others, filed a suit against The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath. The case involved a hearing on the substance of the matter and the court ultimately dismissed the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2634/2012
Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Petitioner Hamza filed a petition seeking a favorable decision, which was allowed on the condition of paying a cost of RS.1000, later paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2705/2012
Case between Nadambadi Santhakumari vs Secretary regarding unspecified matter
Nadambadi Santhakumari filed a case against the Secretary, and the court allowed the case on the condition of paying a cost of Rs.1000.
Civil Dispute
Plaintiff Won
RP 2477/2012
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Petitioner Mullanmadakkal Mammi filed a petition on medical grounds, which was allowed with the condition of paying costs of Rs. 1000.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2703/2012
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
A petition was allowed on the condition that the petitioner pays costs to the respondent by a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 38/2013
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Petition filed by P.Damkumar against multiple judgment debtors was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ST 150/2012
Case between Parappara Abdu vs Moideenkutty regarding jurisdiction transfer
Parappara Abdu filed a case against Moideenkutty which was later transferred to JFCM-I,Tirur.
Criminal Case
EP 481/2012
Case between The Secretary vs Kizhakkethoid Sidhique et al regarding petition dismissal
Petition filed by the Secretary against multiple judgment debtors was dismissed due to absence of evidence on means of R1 and R2, and lack of notice to R3.
Unknown
Defendant Won
EP 180/2013
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Muhammed Thameem as the Decree Holder filed a case against Muhammed Abdul Noor. The petition was dismissed for default due to non-production of necessary documents.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won