Case Summary
Mytheen Kunju is the decree holder who filed the execution petition against Balachandran and others. The court satisfied the execution of the order on the hearing date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the execution was satisfied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The execution petition was satisfied as reported by the Amin.
The execution petition was satisfied as reported by the Amin.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The execution petition was satisfied as reported by the Amin.
The execution petition was satisfied as reported by the Amin.
Supporting Evidence
Submitted that order executed. Amin reported that order executed.
Judgment Evidence:
EP satisfied. Closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mytheen Kunju
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balachandran
- Party Age
- 57
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vasantha Balachandran
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thrikkovilvattam Grama Panchayath
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.Vinayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Renjith Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Execution Petition satisfied.
Evidence:
Submitted that order executed. Amin reported that order executed. EP satisfied.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court referred to the Advocate Commissioner's report indicating that the order was executed.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mytheen Kunju vs Balachandran et al regarding execution of a decree.
Case Code Year
Case between Mytheen Kunju vs Balachandran et al regarding execution of a decree.