Similar Cases
Based on: O.S. No. 1298/2022 — Case between P.G. Victor vs Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple regarding mediation report
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S No. 771/2021
Case between Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha et al vs Tripunithura Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default of the suit.
This case involves a suit filed by Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha and Ramesan G against Tripunithura Municipality. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, which resulted in the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1437/2019
Case between Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom et al vs Jaya Gireesh regarding suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs are Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom and its Bharana Samithi, while the defendant is Jaya Gireesh. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' repeated absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1263/2017
Case between Aiswarya Renjith vs The Padinjare Kuzhuvelil Temple et al regarding non-prosecution
The plaintiff, Aiswarya Renjith, was absent along with her counsel during the hearing. The court dismissed the suit due to non-prosecution since no proof affidavits or applications were filed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 992/2012
Case between Manmadhan M.R et al vs Balabhadra Temple Managing Committee et al regarding temple management and administration.
The plaintiffs, members of the Mannazhath family, are suing to declare their right to manage the Balabhadra Temple, claiming that a committee formed by certain individuals is unlawfully interfering with temple administration. The defendants, a managing committee, argue that the temple is owned by the blacksmith community and that the plaintiffs have no rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 847/2018
Case between M.C. Antony vs The Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
M.C. Antony, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam, the defendant, to prevent forcible eviction from his business property. The case revolves around the claim of ownership and possession of the property by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1035 /20 216
Case between Valsala Krishnankutty et al vs Mattammel Sree Subramania Swamy Temple et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Valsala Krishnankutty and her children, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who are associated with a temple. The plaintiffs contend that they are the rightful owners of a pathway necessary for accessing their property and allege the defendants are attempting to block this access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 294/2006
Case between Sumitha Rahim et al vs Ramachandran et al regarding mandatory injunction and consequential reliefs
The plaintiffs are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, who are the office bearers of neighboring properties. The plaintiffs claim ownership of the properties and allege that the defendants are attempting to interfere with their possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 473/2016
Case between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram represented by Rakesh Venugopal vs Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat regarding perpetual injunction
The case involves a dispute over property rights between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram and Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat. The plaintiff is seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent the defendant from forming a new way through the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 23 / 2016
Case between Alias vs Kerala Kshethra Samrakshana Samithi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, recovery of money and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Alias, claims ownership of a property and seeks to prevent the defendants from encroaching upon it and to recover damages for tree removal. The defendants contest the plaintiff's ownership, claiming the property is dedicated to a deity.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1484/2022
Case between Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
This case involves Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple and its representatives against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was heard and subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1369/2023
Case between Rajan.K. vs Syamakumar et al regarding dismissal as not pressed
The plaintiff, Rajan.K., representing the Idiyadikode Bhagavathi Temple Trust, filed a suit against Syamakumar and Rajakumar, who are members of the same trust. The court ultimately dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1895/2022
Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom vs S.Venugopal regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves a suit filed by Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom against S.Venugopal. The court rejected the plaint due to failure to remit the balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.684/2019
Case between Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust vs Government of Kerala et al regarding a civil suit
The case involves the Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust as the plaintiff against the Government of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff during the trial.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.470/2024
Case between Chempazhanthy Asharivilakam Sree Bhadrakalimandramoorthy Temple Family Trust et al vs Kuttan Asari et al regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs, represented by their Secretary Sukumaran Asari, are a temple family trust. The case involved a suit that was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs and lack of action to summon the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 110 / 2022
Case between Roopa Narayan Misra vs Diety Of Virattamkandy Sri. Bhagavathi Temple et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Roopa Narayan Misra is the plaintiff seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants, which include the Diety Of Virattamkandy Sri. Bhagavathi Temple and others. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff's representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 521/2009
Case between The Deity of Pazhanjannur Sree Subrahmaniya Temple, represented by Baburajan. V. vs Unniathan @ AP Bava Haji et al regarding dismissal for default.
The Deity of Pazhanjannur Sree Subrahmaniya Temple is the plaintiff represented by Baburajan. V., and the defendants include Unniathan @ AP Bava Haji and others. The case was dismissed for default as the counsel was not aware of the listing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.104/2022
Case between Maalikayil Bhagavathi Kshethram et al vs Kuruppathodi Dinesh regarding dismissal for default.
This case involves Maalikayil Bhagavathi Kshethram as the plaintiff and Kuruppathodi Dinesh as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the trial.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 70/2023
Case between K M Chandrabose vs Shivadarshana Devaswam Trust regarding dismissal for default.
K M Chandrabose is the plaintiff in this case against Shivadarshana Devaswam Trust. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation from counsel.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 171/2023
Case between P. S Mohandas vs Tappuzha Sreekrishna Swami Temple et al regarding rejection of suit for balance court fee.
P. S Mohandas is the plaintiff against Tappuzha Sreekrishna Swami Temple and other defendants regarding a suit that was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee. The case was finally heard on the 31st of July, 2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.448/2020
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.
This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 to 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the Balance Court Fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 270/2024 in OS.No.447/2023
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order
Haridasan Potty, the petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 05/11/2024 regarding a suit. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 259/2017
Case between Sree Mulankadakom Devi Temple Trust Administrative Committee vs Baburaj regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, represented by the Trust President, filed a suit for the realization of money against the defendant, Baburaj. Both parties were absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 1010/2022
Case between Vanchippuzhakkavu et al vs Krishnakumar et al regarding setting aside ex-parte decree.
The case involves the petitioners/defendants seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree passed against them. The suit addresses a dispute regarding a temple's management and the plaintiffs' right to perform certain activities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.612/2019
Case between Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity et al vs Priya Somarajan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, including Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity and others, filed a suit against defendant Priya Somarajan for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 827/2016
Case between Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram et al vs Renjith et al regarding management of temple affairs.
This case involves a dispute over the management of Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram between the petitioners, who claim to represent the temple's management committee, and the defendants, who assert their prior authority. The plaintiffs seek a declaration of their rights and an injunction against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1056/2005
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
The plaintiffs, T.O Abraham and Binu Zacharia, were involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, T.O Aleyas and Binoj T. Baby. The matter was settled, and the court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was not present.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S No. 997/2024
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
Plaintiffs include Ammini M.N, Indraja, and Neeraja represented by Ammini M.N, and Defendants include Sindhu, Max Life Insurance Company Ltd., Life Insurance Corporation of India, Royal Swayam Sahaya Sangham, Brothers Swayam Sahaya Sangham, and St. Joseph's Avashatha Nivarana Sangham.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 863/2014
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
Plaintiff Kunju Bava aged 53, S/o. Haidrose Kutti, and defendant C. A Abdulla aged 66, S/o. Abubacker, involved in a dispute over properties in Elamkulam village purchased in 1995. Plaintiff seeking specific performance of agreement dated 26.06.2011
Civil Suit
O.S No. 733/2014
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
In the matter of Nithya vs Babu et al, the plaintiff was not ready for evidence in the listed case, leading to dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 493/2012
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
Case between Prakash Pai, his family members versus Saju, his family members. Suit dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh suit.
Civil Suit
O.S No. 240/2014
Case between Newja N. Joy et al vs Mrs. Lilly et al regarding fixation of boundary, injunction and consequential reliefs
Case involves plaintiffs claiming ownership of property bought from defendants 1 to 3. Dispute arose due to trespassing and boundary issues. Plaintiffs seek to fix boundary and seek injunction against defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.539/2020
Case between M/s Kerala Gramin Bank, Cheranellore Branch, Cheranellore vs Manu Gopi et al regarding Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Plaintiff is M/s Kerala Gramin Bank, Cheranellore Branch represented by Deepthi Prakash. Defendants are Manu Gopi et al. The suit was decreed based on the terms of a successful Mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.309/2021
Case between Sree Narayana Sevika Samajam et al vs Pulikkal Medical Foundation et al regarding Suit filed Under Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
In the matter of Sree Narayana Sevika Samajam vs Pulikkal Medical Foundation regarding a suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff was absent and had no representation. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff did not intend to proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.68/2024
Case between Reji Mathew et al vs Divya Deepak regarding Non-payment of Balance Court Fee
Case between Reji Mathew and others against Divya Deepak regarding non-payment of balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 10/2008
Case between K.C.George et al vs. Divakaran et al regarding boundary fixation, possession recovery, and injunction
Plaintiffs include K.C.George et al, seeking boundary fixation, recovery of possession, and injunction against Divakaran et al.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 546/2018
Case between Yamuna Paul vs K.A Balan et al regarding Absence of Plaintiff
Plaintiff Yamuna Paul, W/o. Paul John, aged 45 years, failed to appear for the case. Judgment was given in favor of defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.245/2018
Case between P R Radhakrishnan et al vs Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam et al regarding declaration and injunction
Plaintiffs are members of a society challenging the actions of the Managing Committee regarding membership eligibility. Defendants are accused of favoritism in admitting new members, leading to a legal dispute.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 136/2018
Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
Garden View Apartment owners Association filed a restoration petition after their suit was dismissed for default when they failed to appear for trial. The court considered the circumstances and allowed the restoration subject to a cost being paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 81/2024
Case between Jishnu P.M vs B.K Santha regarding Absence of Plaintiff
In the matter between Jishnu P.M and B.K Santha, the plaintiff was absent during the court hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1306/2022
Case between Mr. K.D. Josey et al vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction and other reliefs
Mr. K.D. Josey filed suit against The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam for various reliefs. The parties settled during a mediation and entered an agreement, leading to the court decreeing as per the settlement terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1305/2022
Case between Benoy K.A. vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction and other reliefs
Plaintiff Mr. Benoy K.A., aged 50, S/o. Antony, Kakramssery House, Manuel Lane, Thykoodam Desom, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. Defendant The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam, represented by its Secretary, having office at Building No. 51/925, Church Road, Thykoodam, Vyttila, PIN-682019, Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. Suit decreed as per mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
O.S. No.1303/2022
Case between Mr Xavier V A et al vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding Declaration, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, Mandatory Injunction
This is a suit for declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction, and other reliefs. The parties entered into a settlement during mediation, resulting in the revival of the plaintiff's membership with the defendant sangham.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1302/2022
Case between Mr. T.R. Sebastian vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding Declaration, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, Mandatory Injunction and Other Reliefs
Plaintiff Mr. T.R. Sebastian sued defendant The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam for multiple reliefs. The court facilitated a mediation, resulting in a settlement agreement between the parties.
Civil Suit
O.S. No.1300/2022
Case between Mr. Peter K.A. @ Nelson et al vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding Declaration, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, Mandatory Injunction and Other Reliefs
This case involves Mr. Peter K.A. @ Nelson and others as plaintiffs against The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam as the defendant. The plaintiffs sought declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction, and other reliefs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 789/2024
Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
The Union Bank of India filed a suit against Ms. Beena Joseph regarding a legal matter. The case was presented in court but was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S No. 876/2023
Case between Mr. Irshad C.I vs Mrs. Indira Chacko et al regarding undisclosed matter
Involves Mr. Irshad C.I as plaintiff against Mrs. Indira Chacko and another as defendants. The case was dismissed due to absence of both parties.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S No. 232/2019
Case between M/s Desai Homes et al vs M/s DD Misty Hills Apartment Owners Association et al regarding Civil Procedure
Case between M/s Desai Homes et al and M/s DD Misty Hills Apartment Owners Association et al. Suit and IA 8/2023 dismissed for not being pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S. No. 1432/2019
Case between Ashok R Nair et al vs Vinu Lal et al regarding Unspecified Matter
Case involves Ashok R Nair et al filing a suit under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure. The suit got dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won