Case Summary
Case involves plaintiffs claiming ownership of property bought from defendants 1 to 3. Dispute arose due to trespassing and boundary issues. Plaintiffs seek to fix boundary and seek injunction against defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to properly identify the plaint schedule property.
The plaintiffs failed to properly identify the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Newja N. Joy (24 years years)
Nayattil House, Kothad P.O, Korampadam, Pin - 682 027, Ernakulam District
Lincy Joy (47 years years)
Nayattil House, Kothad P.O, Korampadam, Pin - 682 027, Ernakulam District
Paul (Age not specified years)
Defendants
Mrs. Lilly (Age not specified years)
C.C 136/71, Ernakulam North, Cochin - -18
Mr. Rex (Age not specified years)
C.C 136/71, Ernakulam North, Cochin - -18
Mr. Rince (Age not specified years)
C.C 136/71, Ernakulam North, Cochin - 18
Mr. V.V Thankachan (Age not specified years)
Vadakodan House, Kothad P.O, Korampadam, Pin 682 027
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Fixation of Boundary
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiffs sought relief to fix the boundary of the plaint schedule property
Evidence:
No clear decision on boundary fixation due to property identification issues
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiffs obtained plaint schedule property from defendants 1 to 3
Reference:
1837/2013
Document Type:
Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiffs obtained plaint schedule property from defendants 1 to 3
Reference:
1838/2013
Document Type:
Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiffs obtained plaint schedule property from defendants 1 to 3
Reference:
1839/2013
Document Type:
Notarised copy of Survey Sketch
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as proof of property identification, but found to be inconclusive
Reference:
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Identified as a document mistakenly sealed and signed in place of another report
Reference:
Ext.C3
Document Type:
Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence by the defendants
Reference: