Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 171/2023

Case between P. S Mohandas vs Tappuzha Sreekrishna Swami Temple et al regarding rejection of suit for balance court fee.

Court
MUNSIFF PALA
Judge
Sri. Hasheem S
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P. S Mohandas is the plaintiff against Tappuzha Sreekrishna Swami Temple and other defendants regarding a suit that was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee. The case was finally heard on the 31st of July, 2025.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ruled that the suit is rejected because the plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled that the suit is rejected because the plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is rejected. Pronounced in open court on this the 31st day of July, 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. S Mohandas
Party Age
60
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tappuzha Sreekrishna Swami Temple
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajith Kumar
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreepathi
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Kumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E. M Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lal P. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. K Georgekutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit is rejected.
Evidence:
Balance court fee not remitted so far. Today the case is posted for balance court fee as last chance. Hence, the suit is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P. S Mohandas vs Tappuzha Sreekrishna Swami Temple et al regarding rejection of suit for balance court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between P. S Mohandas vs Tappuzha Sreekrishna Swami Temple et al regarding rejection of suit for balance court fee.

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Temple

Similar Cases

Case between K M Chandrabose vs Shivadarshana Devaswam Trust regarding dismissal for default.
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between P.G. Victor vs Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple regarding mediation report
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aiswarya Renjith vs The Padinjare Kuzhuvelil Temple et al regarding non-prosecution
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom et al vs Jaya Gireesh regarding suit dismissal for default.
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha et al vs Tripunithura Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default of the suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won