| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18661 - 18665 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Sunpaul Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s Bauer Engineers & Elevators regarding plaint rejection

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 222/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Salasho Incorporated et al regarding suit for relief

Civil Suit

O.S No. 438/2024

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-11-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nimmy Titto vs Paul Paily et al regarding mediation settlement

Civil Suit

O.S No. 474/2024

Ernakulam

2025-11-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.J.Antony vs K.A.Habeeb regarding settlement of dispute

Civil Suit

O.S No. 588/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunjamma Mathew alias Catherine Mathew et al vs C A Shajahan et al regarding fixation of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1036/2019

Ernakulam

2025-11-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees leading to case dismissal.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case rejection.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs frequently neglected necessary procedural actions, like issuing notices, causing dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear at court hearings as required.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?