O.S No. 438/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Salasho Incorporated et al regarding suit for relief

Court

COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2025-11-25

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendants, M/s. Salasho Incorporated and others. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence without representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and pay the necessary court fees. Consequently, no further representation was provided, leading to the rejection of the case against the defendants.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to represent their case and did not pay the required court fees.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to represent their case and did not pay the required court fees.

Supporting Evidence

Balance Court Fee not paid despite numerous chances and posting as last chance no further time.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit against D1 dismissed. D2 & D3 Ex parte. Plaintiff no representation. Plaintiff is continuously absent without representation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: CANARA BANK

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M/s. Salasho Incorporated

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mrs. Najath K nazrudheen
Party Age: 33
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mrs. Rony Thomas
Party Age: 33
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Saira Phiroz
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit against D1 dismissed.

Evidence:

D1 already dismissed.