Case Summary
Plaintiff Abdul Sattar purchased property in public auction under SARFAESI Act due to default in loan repayment by defendants. Defendants challenged the sale leading to court determining lack of jurisdiction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Court determined lack of jurisdiction due to ongoing appeal before Debt Recovery Tribunal.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Sattar
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o Asanarukunju
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudarshana Shenoy
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- W/o late A D Sadananda Shenoy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A S Suresh Shenoy
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o A D Sadananda Shenoy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A S Rupesh Shenoy
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o A D Sadananda Shenoy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shashwath Shenoy
- Relation
- S/o Shenoy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajesh R Shenoy
- Relation
- S/o A D Ratnakara Shenoy
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sale certificate dated 13/12/2022 issued by Authorized Officer of Union Bank of India
Reference:
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sale deed registered on 20/02/2023 with stamp duty and registration charges
Reference:
592/2023 of SRO, Ernakulam
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act