Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1036/2019

Case between Kunjamma Mathew alias Catherine Mathew et al vs C A Shajahan et al regarding fixation of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Kunjamma Mathew alias Catherine Mathew and others as plaintiffs against C A Shajahan and others as defendants. The plaintiffs seek to fix the boundary and obtain a permanent injunction regarding the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition by the defendants to set aside the ex-parte order was allowed, enabling them to contest the case on its merits. Costs of Rs. 3,000 were awarded to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Costs of Rs. 3,000 to the plaintiff
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition by the defendants to set aside the ex-parte order was allowed, enabling them to contest the case on its merits. Costs of Rs. 3,000 were awarded to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the defendants had a valid reason for their prior non-appearance and allowed their petition for justice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the defendants had a valid reason for their prior non-appearance and allowed their petition for justice.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioners submitted that there was no wilful laches or negligence and prayed that the ex-parte order be set aside and the written statement accepted. The court was satisfied that they should be given an opportunity to contest the suit on merits.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is allowed on costs of Rs.3,000/- to plaintiff, which shall be paid within 14 days. In case of non payment of costs the petition shall be deemed to be dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunjamma Mathew alias Catherine Mathew
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o late V C Mathew
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jacob Mathew
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o late V C Mathew
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thomas Mathew
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o late V C Mathew
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V C George
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o V C Chacko
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dileep Kumar
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C A Shajahan
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o Ajeed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C A Abdul Nazeer
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o Ajeed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shabana Shajahan
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o C A Shajahan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Others
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P K Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arpanai T A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Maria Ancy V J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Libin Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Roshini S Gopi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M S Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K Sunil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Veena C V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aneesh K R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shibu Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajith Viswanath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanu Malakeel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anupama R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abhirami S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V C Xavier
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Princy Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Surthy R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition is allowed on costs of Rs.3,000/- to plaintiff, which shall be paid within 14 days.
Evidence:
In the result, Petition is allowed on costs of Rs.3,000/- to plaintiff, which shall be paid within 14 days.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order dated 13.06.2025 setting petitioners/ 1st and 3ʳᵈ defendants ex-parte is set aside.
Evidence:
Order dated 13.06.2025 setting petitioners/ 1st and 3ʳᵈ defendants ex-parte is set aside.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunjamma Mathew alias Catherine Mathew et al vs C A Shajahan et al regarding fixation of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Kunjamma Mathew alias Catherine Mathew et al vs C A Shajahan et al regarding fixation of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won