Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 588/2025

Case between P.J.Antony vs K.A.Habeeb regarding settlement of dispute

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.J.Antony is the plaintiff against K.A.Habeeb in a civil suit regarding a settlement that has been reached through mediation. The court has decreed the suit in accordance with the terms of the compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement, excluding clause (i) from the agreement. The parties are instructed to approach the court after fulfilling the agreed terms for lifting the attachment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement, excluding clause (i) from the agreement. The parties are instructed to approach the court after fulfilling the agreed terms for lifting the attachment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation report was accepted by the court, leading to a lawful decree based on the terms of the compromise agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation report was accepted by the court, leading to a lawful decree based on the terms of the compromise agreement.
Supporting Evidence
Rest of the terms of the compromise agreement forming part of the mediation report found to be lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement forming part of the mediation report, except clause (i) of the agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.J.Antony
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.A.Habeeb
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Krishnamoorthy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Krishnan Kutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rana Deep K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arathy S Raman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement forming part of the mediation report, except clause (i) of the agreement.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement forming part of the mediation report, except clause (i) of the agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.J.Antony vs K.A.Habeeb regarding settlement of dispute
Case Code Year
Case between P.J.Antony vs K.A.Habeeb regarding settlement of dispute

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won