Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 222/2025

Case between M/s Sunpaul Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s Bauer Engineers & Elevators regarding plaint rejection

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a dispute where the plaintiff, M/s Sunpaul Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the defendant, M/s Bauer Engineers & Elevators. The court rejected the plaint due to failure to remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee despite being given time.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaint rejected due to non-compliance with court fee requirements.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Sunpaul Properties Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) 16/263-B, Near Krishi Bhavan, Mulanthuruthy P O, Ernakulam, Pin : 682 314

Defendants

M/s Bauer Engineers & Elevators (Age not specified years) IV/481, Mangattil Cross Road, Chitrapuzha, Irimpanam P O, Kochi, Ernakulam District, Kerala, Pin : 682 309

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases