| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18681 - 18685 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Fathima Suhara regarding u/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:129/2015

Tirur

2019-09-30

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ashrath Rasheed et al vs Ramla et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 253 OF 2018

Tirur Taluk

2019-11-30

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Abdul Latheef.E regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

EP 14/2018

Malappuram

2019-11-30

1 years, 10 months, 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yousuf vs Mohammedkutty et al regarding an execution petition.

Execution Petition

EP 24/2018

Malappuram

2019-11-30

1 years, 10 months, 7 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Krishnan et al regarding decree execution

Decree Execution

EP 112/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-11-30

0 years, 8 months, 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees leading to case dismissal.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case rejection.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs frequently neglected necessary procedural actions, like issuing notices, causing dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear at court hearings as required.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?