Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 14/2018

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Abdul Latheef.E regarding execution of decree

Court
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-11-30
Duration
1 years, 10 months, 29 days
Case Code No.
14
Case Closed
Sat, 11/30/2019 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Indian Overseas Bank is the decree holder represented by its Senior Manager, while Abdul Latheef.E is the judgment debtor. The case involves the enforcement of a decree for payment and includes stipulations for installment payments.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the respondent to pay the decree amount in installments and recalled the arrest warrant. The respondent was directed to pay Rs.10,000/- each month until the entire decree amount is settled.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed payment in installments.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the respondent to pay the decree amount in installments and recalled the arrest warrant. The respondent was directed to pay Rs.10,000/- each month until the entire decree amount is settled.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it appropriate to allow the payment by installments as per the request of both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found it appropriate to allow the payment by installments as per the request of both parties.
Supporting Evidence
Allowed. respondent is directed to pay Rs.10,000/- each at the bank on or before 10th day of every month until realization of entire decree amount with interest and cost.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore the petition is closed for time being.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indian Overseas Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Latheef.E
Plaintiffs Documents
N/A
Defendants Documents
N/A

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.I. Charles
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.Beena
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
appearing for Abdul Latheef.E: Advocate
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondent is directed to pay Rs.10,000/- each at the bank on or before 10th day of every month until realization of entire decree amount with interest and cost.
Evidence:
respondent is directed to pay Rs.10,000/- each at the bank on or before 10th day of every month until realization of entire decree amount with interest and cost.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2018

Case Flags

Arrest Involved

Quick Facts

Location
Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 01/11/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/30/2019 - 12:00
From
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Secretary vs Muhammedkutty et al regarding full satisfaction of the execution petition.
Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sri.Amjad.M. regarding EP
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Salam et al regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Koyamoideen regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Salam regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won