| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1 - 5 of 2443

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Central Bank of India vs Neethu Shajan regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 610/2025

Ernakulam

2026-01-06

approximately-3 years 20 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Biju C S regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 97/2024

Ernakulam

2026-01-06

approximately-4 years 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Saiju Simon vs Bastin Sebastian regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 150/2025

Ernakulam

2026-01-06

approximately-3 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Laljeevan C R regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.259/2024

Ernakulam

2026-01-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Central Bank of India vs Martin P.J et al regarding loan agreement and limitation.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1179 /20 20

Ernakulam

2026-01-14

approximately-5 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
…
Next page
Last page

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

218

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

33%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta fees, leading to dismissal of cases.

Found in 33 cases (33%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs were often absent during hearings, resulting in dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence

Insufficient evidence presented regarding the means to pay the debt led to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Non-representation

Failure to have legal representation at hearings resulted in the dismissal of many cases.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiffs

Lack of Evidence

Default Due to Non-representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?