Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.259/2024

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Laljeevan C R regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2026-01-13
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 01/13/2026 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. Canara Bank, is seeking recovery of a loan amount from the defendant, Laljeevan C R, who availed an overdraft facility and failed to repay. The suit was filed after the defendant did not respond to summons.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a total sum of Rs.7,10,917.74, along with interest and litigation costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay an amount of 7,10,917.74/- with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a total sum of Rs.7,10,917.74, along with interest and litigation costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 7,10,917.74/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Ten Thousand Nine Hundred and Seventeen and Paise Seventy-Four only), with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Senor Manager & Principal Officer, Darvin C R
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Laljeevan C R
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Request for overdraft facility, Cash Credit Agreement, Pronote for Rs. 3,50,000/-, Letter of Renewal, Pronote for Rs. 3,00,000/-, Letter of Renewal, Acknowledgment of Debt and security, Copy of legal notice issued to the defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suja R Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thresia Anu P J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of the due amount from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 7,10,917.74/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Ten Thousand Nine Hundred and Seventeen and Paise Seventy-Four only), with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest on the due amount from the date of suit.
Evidence:
In default, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the decree amount from the defendant and from his assets with post decretal interest @ 12% per annum.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to the costs of the litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the litigation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan application made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Request for overdraft facility
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the request for the overdraft facility by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement detailing the cash credit terms agreed upon by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Promissory Note for Rs. 3,50,000/-
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Promissory note executed by the defendant acknowledging the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the renewal of the overdraft facility.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Promissory Note for Rs. 3,00,000/-
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Promissory note executed by the defendant for the renewed loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the further renewal of the overdraft facility.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the subsequent renewal of the overdraft facility.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Certified copy of statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing the transactions in the defendant's overdraft account.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document where the defendant acknowledges the debt as of 20-01-2021.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document where the defendant acknowledges the debt as of 21-06-2022.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice issued to the defendant regarding the outstanding debt.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Returned Postal Envelop
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the return of the postal communication to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A13

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Laljeevan C R regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Laljeevan C R regarding recovery of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 03/08/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/13/2026 - 12:00
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won