Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 851/2024

Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-02-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bank of Baroda filed a suit against Ratheesh P.S for recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendant defaulted on the repayment, leading to the bank declaring the loan as a Non-Performing Asset.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed directing the defendant to pay ₹5,82,016.68 along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of litigation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
₹5,82,016.68 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit until realization
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found adequate proof from the plaintiff's unchallenged affidavit and documents supporting the claim for recovery.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of ₹5,82,016.68 (Rupees Five Lakhs Eighty Two Thousand Sixteen point Sixty Eight Paise Only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bank of Baroda (Age not specified years) Kalamassery, Ernakulam - 683 104

Defendants

Ratheesh P.S (43 years years) Pandikkattil, TOG road, Near glass factory, Kalamassery, Ernakulam - 683 104

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court ordered the defendant to pay the outstanding amount due to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of ₹5,82,016.68 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Interest was granted at a specific rate until the realization of the decree amount.
Evidence:
In default, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the decree amount from the defendant and from his assets with post decretal interest @ 6% per annum.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff submitted this document to support the claim regarding the loan application made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter was issued by the plaintiff and accepted by the defendant as proof of the sanctioned loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of Sole Proprietorship
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the defendant's status as the sole proprietor.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement for Composite Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the hypothecation details agreed upon by the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Declaration cum Undertakings cum Authority
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was executed by the defendant as part of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This note was issued by the plaintiff for ₹3,49,000/- and is relevant to the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of installment with acceleration clause
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter outlines the installment plan agreed upon by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This second note was issued by the plaintiff for ₹3,00,000/- and is part of the financial agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Letter of Continuing Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter executed by the defendant serves as ongoing security for the loans.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter indicates the defendant's acknowledgment of debt on the overdraft account.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Letters of Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the defendant's debt on the term loan.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued by the plaintiff to demand repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Notices Returned Unserved
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These notices indicate attempts to contact the defendant that were unsuccessful.
Reference:
Ext.A13series
Document Type: Certified Copy of Statement of Term Loan Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a detailed statement of the defendant's term loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Certified Copy of Statement of Overdraft Loan Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a detailed statement of the defendant's overdraft account.
Reference:
Ext.A15

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases