| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1116 - 1120 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Mariyamu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Nazar regarding rent control

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.55 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-06-20

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mariyamu et al vs Babu Parammal regarding lease and rent control

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.58 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-06-20

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Rahiman et al vs Koyakunhiyakath Abbobacker et al regarding settlement

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 106 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-06-12

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aminakutty et al vs Alikutty @ Babu regarding eviction

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.53 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-02-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aminakutty et al vs Hamza P regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.54 OF 2016

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Petitioner or Counsel

Plaintiff frequently failed to appear for hearings or lacked legal representation, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Multiple cases featured petitions that were dismissed because they were not pressed by the plaintiff or their counsel.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Key Claims

Plaintiffs often could not substantiate essential claims such as landlord-tenant relationships or entitlement to eviction.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Lack of Necessary Documentation

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of required documentation, such as proof of rent payments or lease validity.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Petitioner or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed

Failure to Prove Key Claims

Lack of Necessary Documentation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?