Case Summary
The case involves Aminakutty and others petitioning against Hamza P regarding a rent control issue. The petition was allowed after a lawful compromise was reached, with the respondent vacating the premises.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the terms of the compromise to be lawful.
The court found the terms of the compromise to be lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful the Rent Control Petition is allowed as per the terms of the compromise.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Aminakutty (63 years years)
Kizhakkeparambil House, Kuttippuram amsom, deosm, Tirur Taluk
Ismail (39 years years)
Kizhakkeparambil House, Kuttippuram amsom, deosm, Tirur Taluk
Misiriyya (35 years years)
Kizhakkeparambil House, Kuttippuram amsom, deosm, Tirur Taluk
Moideenkutty (29 years years)
Kizhakkeparambil House, Kuttippuram amsom, deosm, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Hamza. P (65 years years)
Pottarath House, Kuttipuram amsom, desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The Rent Control Petition is allowed as per the terms of the compromise.
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful the Rent Control Petition is allowed as per the terms of the compromise. It is learnt from the terms of compromise that the respondent has vacated the petition schedule premises and the petitioners have taken over its possession.