Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.54 OF 2016

Case between Aminakutty et al vs Hamza P regarding Rent Control

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Aminakutty and others petitioning against Hamza P regarding a rent control issue. The petition was allowed after a lawful compromise was reached, with the respondent vacating the premises.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The Rent Control Petition was allowed as per the terms of compromise, with the respondent vacating the premises. The compromise will be a part of the court's order.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The Rent Control Petition was allowed as per the terms of compromise, with the respondent vacating the premises. The compromise will be a part of the court's order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the terms of the compromise to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
It is learnt from the terms of compromise that the respondent has vacated the petition schedule premises and the petitioners have taken over its possession.

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise is lawful the Rent Control Petition is allowed as per the terms of the compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aminakutty
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ismail
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Misiriyya
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moideenkutty
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hamza. P
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Mujeeb Rehamn
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The Rent Control Petition is allowed as per the terms of the compromise.
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful the Rent Control Petition is allowed as per the terms of the compromise. It is learnt from the terms of compromise that the respondent has vacated the petition schedule premises and the petitioners have taken over its possession.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aminakutty et al vs Hamza P regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Aminakutty et al vs Hamza P regarding Rent Control

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between P.K.Hamzakutty et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between T. Muhammed Ashraf et al vs Painingal Muhammedkutty regarding eviction of shop room
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Shihabudheen vs Shaji regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Koloor Hamza et al vs Mundekkat Muhammed Shafi et al regarding lease and rent control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Kakkuzhiyil Basheer et al vs Eranhikatt Alavikutty regarding rent arrears
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Plaintiff Won