Case Summary
Petition filed by Abdu Rahiman and Koyakunhiyakath Abbobacker was settled amicably with specified terms agreed upon.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Settlement agreement
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The matter was settled between parties with the petitioner agreeing to pay Rs. 10 Lakhs to the respondent for vacant possession of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Settlement reached between parties with specified terms agreed upon.
Settlement reached between parties with specified terms agreed upon.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Settlement reached between parties with specified terms agreed upon.
Settlement reached between parties with specified terms agreed upon.
Supporting Evidence
Since the terms of compromise are lawful, the RCP is allowed as per the terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of the order.
Judgment Evidence:
The matter is settled between the parties. A compromise is also filed. The RCP is allowed as per the terms of compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdu Rahiman
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koyakunhiyakath thekke Ottayil Abbobacker
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Settlement Agreement
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Settlement agreement with specified terms agreed upon.
Evidence:
The matter is settled between the parties. A compromise is also filed. The RCP is allowed as per the terms of compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdu Rahiman et al vs Koyakunhiyakath Abbobacker et al regarding settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Abdu Rahiman et al vs Koyakunhiyakath Abbobacker et al regarding settlement
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case