RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.55 OF 2015

Case between Mariyamu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Nazar regarding rent control

Court

Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B., RENT CONTROLLER

Order Date

2017-06-20

Duration

1 year

Case Closed

Tue, 06/20/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rent control petition filed by multiple petitioners including Mariyamu and Muhammed Abdul Nazar, where the court dismissed the petition due to absence of representation by the petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Dismissed

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The petition was dismissed due to absence of representation by the petitioners.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition filed by the petitioner under section 5(1) of Kerala Building ( lease and rent control) Act. Counsel for the petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Hence name of the petitioner called absent. No representation. Hence petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Mariyamu
Party Age: 62
Relation: W/o. ThottuKanni Marakkar

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Abdul Nazar
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o. Kunhimuhammed

Plaintiffs Documents

Not mentioned

Defendants Documents

Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. M.A. Ismail
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Vipin.K
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Seeking order under section 5(1) of Kerala Building ( lease and rent control) Act

Evidence:

No representation. Hence petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification