Case Summary
The petitioners, Aminakutty and her children, seek eviction of the respondent, Alikutty, from a rental property due to non-payment of rent and the need for space to conduct a hardware business. The court found the petitioners' need for eviction to be bona fide.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the rental property
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the eviction petition filed by the petitioners, directing the respondent to vacate the premises within two months and to pay costs to the petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established a bona fide need for eviction under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
The petitioners established a bona fide need for eviction under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The need of the petitioners to get eviction of this building is very much bonafide. Additionally, the respondent has other shop rooms in the same town where he is conducting business.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed u/s 11 (3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act as follows: 1. The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule room to the petitioner within 2 months from the date of order.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aminakutty
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ismail
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Misiriyya
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Moideenkutty
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alikutty @ Babu
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.K. Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Sree Hari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule room to the petitioner within 2 months from the date of order.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed u/s 11 (3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act as follows: 1. The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule room to the petitioner within 2 months from the date of order.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is hereby directed to pay costs to the petitioner.
Evidence:
The respondent is hereby directed to pay costs to the petitioner.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Aminakutty et al vs Alikutty @ Babu regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Aminakutty et al vs Alikutty @ Babu regarding eviction