Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 70 OF 2016

Case between Abdurahiman et al vs Rukhiya et al regarding eviction for non-payment of rent

Court
Court of Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2017-11-08
Duration
1 year 5 months 28 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdurahiman filed a petition seeking eviction of Rukhiya for non-payment of rent. The petitioner claimed that the respondent's neglect caused damage to the building and eviction was sought due to arrears and breach of contract.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the eviction order against the respondent directing her to vacate the property within two months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner successfully demonstrated non-payment of rent, the respondent's neglect causing damage to the building, and breach of contract.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed under section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdurahiman (65 years) Kuriyedath House, Ponmundam amsom, desom, Post Ponmundam, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Rukhiya (41 years) Paleri House, Ponmundam amsom, desom, Post Ponmundam, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction order for non-payment of rent and damage to the building
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of lawyer notice with postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding arrears of rent and possession of the room.
Reference:
A1(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of notice served.
Reference:
A1(b)

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 05/11/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases