Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 74 OF 2015

Case between Mannil Kunhalan Haji's children vs Vasu et al regarding eviction of respondents.

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mannil Kunhalan Haji's children filed a petition seeking eviction of Vasu and Sreedharan due to non-payment of rent and bona fide need for the shop room for the petitioners' son, Marzook, to start a business. The respondents contested the petition, claiming they rely on the shop room for their livelihood.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the eviction petition filed by the petitioners, granting them possession of the shop room and ordering the respondents to vacate within three months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioners.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the eviction petition filed by the petitioners, granting them possession of the shop room and ordering the respondents to vacate within three months.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners proved their bona fide need for the shop room.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. After considering the evidence, I am satisfied that the petitioners have successfully proved that they bona fide require the shop room for the proposed business.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed under S. 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act as follows: The respondents are directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioners within three months from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Marsook
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jasim
Party Age
35
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jameela
Party Age
47
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Safiya
Party Age
46
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Naseema
Party Age
42
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasu
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreedharan
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lawyer notice dated 23-05-2015, Postal receipts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Khaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Ramya.C.T.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners were granted eviction of the respondents from the shop room.
Evidence:
the respondents are directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioners within three months from today.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to realise the costs of the petition from the respondents.
Evidence:
the petitioner is entitled to realise the cost of the proceedings from respondents.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court used this document to show that the petitioners demanded the surrender of vacant possession of the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court included this document to illustrate the respondents' response to the petitioners' notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Returned notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked to provide evidence regarding the communication with the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mannil Kunhalan Haji's children vs Vasu et al regarding eviction of respondents.
Case Code Year
Case between Mannil Kunhalan Haji's children vs Vasu et al regarding eviction of respondents.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Pilakkattil Kunhoosakutty Haji vs The District Registrar (GL), Malappuram et al regarding rent control
The Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Aminakutty et al vs Alikutty @ Babu regarding eviction
THE COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kainikkara Abdurehiman vs Edasseri Ibrahim's Children et al regarding rent arrears
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Abdurahiman et al vs Rukhiya et al regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
Court of Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kakkuzhiyil Basheer vs Cherukkara Musthafa regarding rent arrears and subletting
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won