Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.58 OF 2015

Case between Mariyamu et al vs Babu Parammal regarding lease and rent control

Court
RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B.
Order Date
2017-06-20
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Tue, 06/20/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Eight petitioners, including Mariyamu, Suhara, Shamsudheen, Faisal, Fousiya, Seenath, Mashood, and Musthafa, residing in Tirur Taluk, filed a petition under section 5(1) of the Kerala Building (lease and rent control) Act against Babu Parammal from Calicut Industrious, Payyananagadi.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed for default as the counsel for the petitioner reported having no instruction from the client and the petitioner was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the petition
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default as the counsel for the petitioner reported having no instruction from the client and the petitioner was absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mariyamu
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o. Thottukanni Marakkar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu Parammal
Party Age
35
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.A. Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Vipin.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Petition Dismissal
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of the petition for default
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Rent Control Dispute
Case Code
Case between Mariyamu et al vs Babu Parammal regarding lease and rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Mariyamu et al vs Babu Parammal regarding lease and rent control

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 06/20/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/20/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 06/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Ajith Kumar.U. regarding rent dispute
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Both (settled)
Case between Beeran Haji vs Habeeb Rehman regarding rent control
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won