Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 62 OF.2015

Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Ajith Kumar.U. regarding rent dispute

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G.
Order Date
2015-08-19
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Wed, 08/19/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petition filed under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act settled through mediation. The rent for the petition schedule property was fixed at Rs.1,000 per month with 5% annual increment.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court accepted the agreement between the parties and fixed the rent of the petition schedule property at Rs.1,000 per month with an annual increment of 5%.
Judgment Favored
Both (Settled)
Relief Granted
Agreement acceptance and rent fixation
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the agreement between the parties and fixed the rent of the petition schedule property at Rs.1,000 per month with an annual increment of 5%.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Matter settled between parties: Terms of the memorandum of agreement executed by the parties is lawful. Hence the agreement is accepted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunhimohammed Haji
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o Kadayikkal Beeran Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajith Kumar.U.
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o Valappil Unnikrishnan Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Krishnanunni
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. K. Beena
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Agreement acceptance
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Acceptance of the terms of the memorandum of agreement executed by the parties
Evidence:
Matter settled between parties: Terms of the memorandum of agreement executed by the parties is lawful. Hence the agreement is accepted.
Relief Type: Rent Fixing
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Fixed the rent of petition schedule property at Rs.1,000 per month with 5% annual increment
Evidence:
Matter settled between parties: Terms of the memorandum of agreement executed by the parties is lawful. Hence the agreement is accepted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Ajith Kumar.U. regarding rent dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Ajith Kumar.U. regarding rent dispute

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 08/19/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/19/2015 - 12:00
From
Sat, 08/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Mon, 08/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Beeran Haji vs Habeeb Rehman regarding rent control
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mohamed Rafi et al vs Pariyapurath Suresh regarding lease and rent control
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won