Temple

The case involves plaintiff Sajai Kumar seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who are managing the Valia Koonambaikulam Sree Bhadrakali Temple. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants are engaging in unauthorized construction on government land.

Haridasan Potty, the petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 05/11/2024 regarding a suit. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not represented in court.

Haridasan Potty, the petitioner/plaintiff, filed a petition to restore a suit that was previously ordered to be dismissed. The respondents remained absent despite notice.

This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 to 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the Balance Court Fee.

James Varghese is the plaintiff, and the defendants include the Travancore Devaswam Board, Vellappattukavu Sree Vanadurga Temple Advisory Committee, and the Government of Kerala. The case was dismissed as not pressed on the hearing date.

P. S Mohandas is the plaintiff against Tappuzha Sreekrishna Swami Temple and other defendants regarding a suit that was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee. The case was finally heard on the 31st of July, 2025.

K M Chandrabose is the plaintiff in this case against Shivadarshana Devaswam Trust. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation from counsel.

Shibu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against R. Rajagopalakrishnan and others. The case arises from a dispute over property ownership and related claims.

This case involves Maalikayil Bhagavathi Kshethram as the plaintiff and Kuruppathodi Dinesh as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the trial.

The Deity of Pazhanjannur Sree Subrahmaniya Temple is the plaintiff represented by Baburajan. V., and the defendants include Unniathan @ AP Bava Haji and others. The case was dismissed for default as the counsel was not aware of the listing.