Temple

The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.

This case involves a dispute over the management of Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram between the petitioners, who claim to represent the temple's management committee, and the defendants, who assert their prior authority. The plaintiffs seek a declaration of their rights and an injunction against the defendants.

The plaintiffs, including Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity and others, filed a suit against defendant Priya Somarajan for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented.

The case involves the petitioners/defendants seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree passed against them. The suit addresses a dispute regarding a temple's management and the plaintiffs' right to perform certain activities.

G. Haridasan Potty filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom after the defendants aimed to obstruct his daily rituals at the temple. The case centers around the plaintiff's rights to perform rituals at the temple without interference.

The plaintiff, represented by the Trust President, filed a suit for the realization of money against the defendant, Baburaj. Both parties were absent during the hearing.

This case involves a petition by Thottakkattu Sreekrishna Swamy Temple against Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner.

The plaintiffs, including Perayam Sri. Bhoothanadha Temple and its president, filed a suit for injunction. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and lack of representation.

Radhamani Amma and other plaintiffs filed a suit against the Kerala State and others to declare their right of easement over a property and seek a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case involves multiple petitions for re-opening evidence and appointing a commission advocate.

The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.