Panchayat

The plaintiffs, Aleyamma M V and her son Aby Abraham Varghese, filed a suit against Pambady Grama Panchayath to prevent the closure of a road used for access to their property. The case was heard as the defendant did not file a written statement.

The plaintiff Unni filed a suit against Pampady Grama Panchayath. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties.

The plaintiffs, Thomas @ Baby and Mathew, claim to be the absolute owners of properties and are contesting the defendant's action of measuring their private road without legal right. The suit seeks to declare the road as private property and prevent the defendant from taking further action.

Mundiyott ABOOBACKER is the plaintiff in this civil suit. The case involved a dispute leading to the plaintiff not pressing the suit.

The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.

HAMEED HAJI and others are plaintiffs suing VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent trespassing into their property and related acts. The case arose due to actions taken by the defendants on 18-11-2024.

The plaintiffs, Rakhi @ Ragisha and Kamala, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali and others, who are alleged to have trespassed into their property to mark for road widening without consent. The plaintiffs contest the defendants' claims of rights over their property.

This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.

The petitioner CHANDRAN seeks to restore a prior petition that was dismissed for default. The respondents include the Secretary of Nadapuram Grama Panchayath and other officials.

Purameri Panchayath Vanitha Cooperative Society Ltd. filed a petition against Nidhin. M. M and Damodharan. P for enforcement of an award. The matter was settled in Adalath with terms agreed upon by the parties.