Case Summary
The plaintiff Unni filed a suit against Pampady Grama Panchayath. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Defendant was not present, and no representation was made.
Defendant was not present, and no representation was made.
Why Defendant Won:
Defendant was not present, and no representation was made.
Defendant was not present, and no representation was made.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted the absence of both parties during the hearing.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Unni
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- C/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pampady Grama Panchayath
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Santhosh Kesavnath P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajeev P Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to non-payment of batta.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Unni vs Pampady Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Unni vs Pampady Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissal