Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RPIA 16/2025

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding restoration of a dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
approximately-4 months
Case Code No.
16
Case Closed
Fri, 12/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner CHANDRAN seeks to restore a prior petition that was dismissed for default. The respondents include the Secretary of Nadapuram Grama Panchayath and other officials.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition RPIA 16/2025 was dismissed as it lacked proper legal basis to restore a previous petition dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition RPIA 16/2025 was dismissed as it lacked proper legal basis to restore a previous petition dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The petition did not meet the necessary legal requirements as the original restoration petition was dismissed for non-appearance.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition did not meet the necessary legal requirements as the original restoration petition was dismissed for non-appearance.
Supporting Evidence
The remedy available to the petitioner is to file a fresh restoration petition with a delay condonation petition if any.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, in the light of discussions the petition is not proper and is only to be dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
CHANDRAN
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SECRETARY
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
AJEENDRAN ALAKKANDI
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SARANYA
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
POOMALAVEETTIL MOHANAN
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Jishine Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C. R. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The petition to restore RPIA 10/2025 was not proper and was dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence, in the light of discussions the petition is not proper and is only to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RPIA
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 12/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between State of Kerala vs Vasu Eranchikkal regarding penalty payment
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, NADAPURAM
Miscellaneous Case Plaintiff Won
Case between State of Kerala vs Prakasan et al regarding surety penalty
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, NADAPURAM
Unknown Plaintiff Won
Case between N. K. Chandran vs SECRETARY, NADAPURAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH regarding suit dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between State of Kerala vs Kunhikannan regarding null
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, NADAPURAM
null Unknown
Case between Avarankal Raheem vs Government of Kerala et al regarding petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Petition Plaintiff Won