Devaswom Board

The case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Asha.S and Ajithkumar, and the defendants, Asokan.G and others, concerning a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs are seeking to restrain the defendants from trespassing on their properties and obstructing their access to a pathway.

The plaintiff, represented by its President, was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit. The defendant is the Kerala Vyapari Vyavasai Ekopana Samithi.

The case involves the applicant, Manohar, seeking a declaration and an injunction related to a property, originally part of 60 cents but reduced after a road acquisition. The defendants, including the Travancore Devasom Board and the State of Kerala, are involved in claims over the property, which the applicant argues was wrongly assessed as belonging to a temple.

Sheela Johnson filed a suit against the Travancore Devaswom Board and others for a declaration and injunction concerning a property dispute. The case revolves around conflicting claims over property ownership and the validity of survey records.

M.J Rajkumar @ Baby filed a suit against Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswom and its President. The case was settled in mediation.

The Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board and its Sub Group Officer are the plaintiffs, while K.V.Santhoshkumar is the defendant. The case involves the rejection of the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee despite multiple opportunities.

The plaintiffs, represented by the Devaswam Secretary, filed a suit for the realization of money against the defendant, P Anilkumar. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fee.

The plaintiffs, led by K.H.Balachandra Shenoy, sought to proceed with their suit, but were unable to present evidence due to absences. The court dismissed the suit for lack of readiness from the plaintiffs.

This case involves plaintiffs Kootupuram Mahavishnukhethra Sevasamithi and a representative against the officials of the Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

The plaintiffs, represented by their secretary and president, are involved in a suit against the defendants regarding an unspecified matter. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.