Case Summary
The plaintiffs, represented by the Devaswam Secretary, filed a suit for the realization of money against the defendant, P Anilkumar. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected by the court because the plaintiffs failed to remit the balance court fee despite being given time to do so.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fee under Order VII Rule 11(c) of CPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thiruvithaamkoor Devasam
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sub Group Officer, Pattupurakkavu Devaswam sub group
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P Anilkumar
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.P. Easanan Namboodiripad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Damodaran.V.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Greeshma Shanmukhan .S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected for non payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fee under Order VII Rule 11(c) of CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Thiruvithaamkoor Devasam et al vs P Anilkumar regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Thiruvithaamkoor Devasam et al vs P Anilkumar regarding realization of money.