O. S. No.168/2019

Case between Kandangakkavu Mahachandika Devaswam et al vs Paulose et al regarding default dismissal

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR

Judge

Smt. Sumey Chandran

Order Date

2025-09-11

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by their secretary and president, are involved in a suit against the defendants regarding an unspecified matter. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Cost to defendant No.1

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing and did not have any representation.

Key Reasoning:

Why Defendant Won:

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant No.1.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kandangakkavu Mahachandika Devaswam

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Robin V Ravi
Party Age: 31
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rajesh Kumar
Party Age: 41
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Paulose
Party Age: 75
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Lilly
Party Age: 70
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Biju
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: P K Latha
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K M Alias
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: P V Shiji
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant No.1.

Evidence: