Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.42/2020

Case between Kootupuram Mahavishnukhethra Sevasamithi vs Commissioner, Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board Office regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-13
Duration
Case Code No.
42
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs Kootupuram Mahavishnukhethra Sevasamithi and a representative against the officials of the Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence led to dismissal for default.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence led to dismissal for default.
Supporting Evidence
Not applicable.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kootupuram Mahavishnukhethra Sevasamithi
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sree Koottupuram Mahavishnukhethrasevasamithy, represented by its member, K. N. Vinod
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Commissioner, Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board Office
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Assistant Commissioner, Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board Office
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. G. Muraleedharan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R. Dileep Chandran
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kootupuram Mahavishnukhethra Sevasamithi, its Secretary, P. G. Vinodkumar
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Govindan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. O. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. Rajendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Udayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. santhoshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Devaswom Board

Similar Cases

Case between M.J Rajkumar @ Baby vs Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswom et al regarding mediation settlement.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board Represented By Secretary et al vs K.V.Santhoshkumar regarding non payment of Balance Court Fee.
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thiruvithaamkoor Devasam et al vs P Anilkumar regarding realization of money.
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kandangakkavu Mahachandika Devaswam et al vs Paulose et al regarding default dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won