Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.61/2024

Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involving Prakash V against Chummar and others, suit rejected due to plaintiff's absence and balance court fee non-payment.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff absent and balance court fee not paid, suit rejected under Order 7 Rule 11.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Prakash V (50 years) Manikandamandhiram House, Kumarapuram Kara, Kunnathunadu Village, Peringala P. O., Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin-683565

Defendants

Chummar (93 years) Parapurathu House, Peringala Kara, Kunnathunadu Village, Peringala P. O., Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin-683565 Bejoy P Chummar (45 years) Parapurathu House, Peringala Kara, Kunnathunadu Village, Peringala P.O., Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin-683565

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases