Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.190/2014

Case between Saramma, et al vs Jose Kuriakose, et al regarding property measurement dispute

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-15
Duration
Case Code No.
190
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs include Saramma, Varkey Kurian, Shaji P T, and Shelbi Poulose. Defendants include Jose Kuriakose and Mathukunju. The case concerns the inability to complete property measurements due to missing survey materials.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court ordered further measurements of the properties of both parties based on old survey numbers, title documents, and sub-division plans.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered further measurements of the properties of both parties based on old survey numbers, title documents, and sub-division plans.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saramma
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o Kurian
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Varkey Kurian
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o Kurian
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shaji P T
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o Thankachan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shelbi Poulose
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o Thankachan, W/o Poulose
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Others
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jose Kuriakose
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o Kuriakose
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathukunju
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o Kuriakose
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Others
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Measurement of properties based on old survey numbers and title documents
Reference:
Document Type: Document No. 2820/1994 and Document No. 156/1974
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documents relied upon by the defendant for property measurement
Reference:
Document Type: Judgment of the High Court in W.P.(C) No. 9645 of 2014
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Directions to consider application and pass orders regarding property measurement
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2014

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won