Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1140/2017

Case between K.H.Balachandra Shenoy et al vs Sivananda Pai @ Raghavendra Thirtha et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-10-17
Duration
approximately-8 years 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by K.H.Balachandra Shenoy, sought to proceed with their suit, but were unable to present evidence due to absences. The court dismissed the suit for lack of readiness from the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiffs were dismissed due to their failure to present evidence, resulting in the dismissal of their suit for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate readiness to proceed with the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, IA 10/25 is dismissed. Accordingly suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K.H.Balachandra Shenoy (54 years years) Kalarikkal house, 28/361, 3rd Avenur, Ponoth road, Kaloor, Koci – 682 017. P.K.Vedavyas (63 years years) ‘Sudarshana’, 33/2157, Manakkodam road, Elamakkara, Kochi – 682 026. R.Ramnath (44 years years) South Mathirapally house, Cheranalloor, Kochi – 682 034.

Defendants

Sivananda Pai @ Raghavendra Thirtha (44 years years) now residing at Dwaraka Kalamandhir, Pudukkalavattom, Elamakkara, Kochi – 682 026. N.K.Prabhakara Naik (67 years years) 40/7046, Gopala Prabhu road, Ernakulam, Kochi – 35. V.Rajkumar Kamath (57 years years) 40/7183, Sreeram Nilayam, TD road, Ernakulam, Cochin – 35. G.Retnakara Prabhu (65 years years) Secretary, GSS Sangham, TD road, Ernakulam. A.K.Chanrasekhara Prabhu (51 years years) Radhesyam, Near Sannan Clinic, Ayyappankavu, Chittoor road, Ernakulam, Cochin – 18.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
IA 10/25 filed by the counsel for the plaintiffs seeking to remove the suit from the list.
Evidence:
Hence, IA 10/25 is dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, I find no bonafides on the part of the plaintiff. Hence, IA 10/25 is dismissed. Accordingly suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases