Devaswom Board

Padminiamma filed a restoration petition to set aside an ex-parte decree due to health issues and inability to file a written statement. The respondent, Urayma Devaswom Board, objected to the petition.

The case involves Kumarakom Sreekumaramangalam Devaswayogam as the plaintiff, represented by its President and Treasurer, seeking an ad interim injunction against the defendant, K P Anandhakuttan, to prevent interference with the functioning of their office.

Devasya, the petitioner, seeks eviction of the respondent, V. K.Sasi, from a shop room for non-payment of rent and for starting a business. The respondent contests the eviction on various grounds, including claims of regular payment of rent.

The plaintiff, Edoli Pankajam, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants, Pulparambil Aneesh and Ralanth Kumar, regarding a property related to the Poloor Subramania Temple. The defendants, a committee associated with the temple, argue that the suit lacks necessary parties and is not maintainable.

The plaintiff Raghuveer has sued for a mandatory and prohibitory injunction concerning the use of a property pathway, which he claims is essential for accessing his owned properties. The defendants include a temple and its management board, which assert that the plaintiff has no legal right over the disputed pathway.

The case involves Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom represented by its President and V. Venkiteswara Pai. The plaintiff's suit was dismissed as not pressed.

The case involves Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumla Devaswom represented by V. Santhoshkumar as the plaintiff and Nizarudeen as the defendant. The plaintiff's counsel indicated that the suit is not pressed, leading to its dismissal.

The case involves a suit by Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom against Abdul Rahim. The matter was settled in mediation and accepted by the court.

The case involved Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom as the plaintiff and T.M Suhaimykutty as the defendant. The plaintiff's counsel indicated that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.

The plaintiff, represented by its President, filed a suit against the defendant, a businessman. The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit accordingly.