Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 485/2025

Case between Kumarakom Sreekumaramangalam Devaswayogam et al vs K P Anandhakuttan regarding ad interim injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
Case Code No.
485
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kumarakom Sreekumaramangalam Devaswayogam as the plaintiff, represented by its President and Treasurer, seeking an ad interim injunction against the defendant, K P Anandhakuttan, to prevent interference with the functioning of their office.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad interim injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's office.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's office.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case has been made out by the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case has been made out by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent is restrained from locking down the plaintiff's Office and from interfering with the functioning of the office and institution of the plaintiff / petitioner until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kumarakom Sreekumaramangalam Devaswayogam
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A K Jayaprakash
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
PG Chandran
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K P Anandhakuttan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajeev P Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nigil George Thomas
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K R Abhirami Kartha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Archa Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Denny Jose Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sneha Sara Saji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun Sasi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent is restrained from locking down the plaintiff's Office and from interfering with the functioning of the office and institution of the plaintiff / petitioner until further orders.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the very purpose of the above application. Hence ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent is restrained from locking down the plaintiff's Office and from interfering with the functioning of the office and institution of the plaintiff / petitioner until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Devaswom Board

Similar Cases

Case between R Ramachandran Nair et al vs Sivasankarapanicker et al regarding ad interim injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Divya R Nair vs Deepthy R Nair et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Saina Joy et al vs Jeo George regarding obstruction to the use of bathroom/toilet.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Saina Joy, Joy Markose vs Jeo George regarding obstruction to the user of bathroom/toilet.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Pathorse vs Ambily M B et al regarding injunction against trespassing and demolition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Defendant Won