Case between Divya R Nair vs Deepthy R Nair et al regarding injunction

Case Summary

Divya R Nair has filed a petition for an ad interim injunction against Deepthy R Nair and others. The court granted the injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing and obstructing the plaintiff's residence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court granted an interim injunction requested by the plaintiff. This prevents the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful residence.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Ad interim injunction against trespassing and obstruction.

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

No

The court granted an interim injunction requested by the plaintiff. This prevents the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful residence.

Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the application.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence ad interim injunction is granted and the respondents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule and from causing obstruction to the peaceful residence of the plaintiff and her mother in the plaint schedule property until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Divya R Nair
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Deepthy R Nair
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Adithyan Krishnan
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ananthakrishnan
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Hariprabha
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Ad interim injunction is granted restraining the respondents from trespassing into the plaint schedule and causing obstruction to the peaceful residence of the plaintiff.

Evidence: