Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 395/2025

Case between R Ramachandran Nair et al vs Sivasankarapanicker et al regarding ad interim injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-10-16
Duration
Case Code No.
395
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves petitioners R Ramachandran Nair and Karunakaran Pillai seeking an ad interim injunction against defendants Sivasankarapanicker and Sajan Chacko related to property disputes. The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad interim injunction preventing the defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs' use of the property at issue until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction preventing the defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs' use of the property at issue until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case has been made out.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am Satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence ad interim injunction is granted and the respondents shall not cause obstruction to the user of the plaint schedule item no. 1 property until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
R Ramachandran Nair
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Karunakaran Pillai
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sivasankarapanicker
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajan Chacko
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hariprbha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad interim injunction is granted and the respondents shall not cause obstruction to the user of the plaint schedule item no. 1 property until further order.
Evidence:
I am Satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the very purpose of the above application. Hence ad interim injunction is granted and the respondents shall not cause obstruction to the user of the plaint schedule item no. 1 property until further order.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Divya R Nair vs Deepthy R Nair et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Saina Joy et al vs Jeo George regarding obstruction to the use of bathroom/toilet.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kumarakom Sreekumaramangalam Devaswayogam et al vs K P Anandhakuttan regarding ad interim injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Saina Joy, Joy Markose vs Jeo George regarding obstruction to the user of bathroom/toilet.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Pathorse vs Ambily M B et al regarding injunction against trespassing and demolition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Defendant Won